You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> on 2004/01/08 21:31:41 UTC
FNM_PERIOD, etc...
We're being sloppy with these... Shouldn't all FNM_* in
httpd be using the APR versions? Just grepping for
FNM_PERIOD...
./modules/generators/mod_autoindex.c:
FNM_NOESCAPE | FNM_PERIOD)
./modules/generators/mod_autoindex.c:
FNM_NOESCAPE | FNM_PERIOD | FNM_CASE_BLIND)
./modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c: int fnm_flags =
FNM_PERIOD|FNM_CASE_BLIND;
./server/config.c: FNM_PERIOD) ==
APR_SUCCESS)) {
Re: FNM_PERIOD, etc...
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
At 02:31 PM 1/8/2004, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>We're being sloppy with these... Shouldn't all FNM_* in
>httpd be using the APR versions? Just grepping for
>FNM_PERIOD...
I would think so ... patch on :)
>./modules/generators/mod_autoindex.c:
>FNM_NOESCAPE | FNM_PERIOD)
>./modules/generators/mod_autoindex.c:
>FNM_NOESCAPE | FNM_PERIOD | FNM_CASE_BLIND)
>./modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c: int fnm_flags = FNM_PERIOD|FNM_CASE_BLIND;
>./server/config.c: FNM_PERIOD) == APR_SUCCESS)) {
Re: FNM_PERIOD, etc...
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
At 02:31 PM 1/8/2004, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>We're being sloppy with these... Shouldn't all FNM_* in
>httpd be using the APR versions? Just grepping for
>FNM_PERIOD...
I would think so ... patch on :)
>./modules/generators/mod_autoindex.c:
>FNM_NOESCAPE | FNM_PERIOD)
>./modules/generators/mod_autoindex.c:
>FNM_NOESCAPE | FNM_PERIOD | FNM_CASE_BLIND)
>./modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c: int fnm_flags = FNM_PERIOD|FNM_CASE_BLIND;
>./server/config.c: FNM_PERIOD) == APR_SUCCESS)) {