You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@iotdb.apache.org by Xiangdong Huang <sa...@gmail.com> on 2020/04/26 10:21:48 UTC
The "latest" tag of IoTDB docker image has moved to "0.9.1-jre8"
Hi,
Julian reported that there were some issues in our docker image with tag
"0.9.1" [1] (though I did not reproduce any issues).
And, he provided a fixed version [2]. I tried the fixed version and it
works also well. Therefore, I uploaded it to docker hub tag with
"0.9.1-jre8" [3].
To avoid others occur the same issue that Julian occurred,
I moved the "latest" tag from "0.9.1" to "0.9.1-jre8".
[1]
https://hub.docker.com/layers/apache/iotdb/0.9.1/images/sha256-f695c422723cd0abc42ed0cd50a792307ca16ded319de2a77c410ef12341d85e?context=explore
[2]
https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/commit/cbc9376681c151f9aa10c5dcc1672426c2e78e1d
[3]
https://hub.docker.com/layers/apache/iotdb/0.9.1-jre8/images/sha256-5dfc5a8303bfe5221e8b80f33002eb85b1d4b7b93a040f2934900b125ea0e501?context=explore
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
Apache IoTDB PPMC
Re: The "latest" tag of IoTDB docker image has moved to "0.9.1-jre8"
Posted by Julian Feinauer <j....@pragmaticminds.de>.
Hi,
thats totally fine and how it should be done : )
Julian
Am 27.04.20, 09:24 schrieb "Dawei Liu" <at...@163.com>:
Hi,
Sorry to Julian and Xiangdong,
As the v0.9.2 is released now, I think we need to move the "latest" tag to this version.
Let me know if there is any other issues.
Thanks
---
Dawei Liu
On 04/26/2020 21:37,Xiangdong Huang<sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Justin,
Thanks for reminding me.
Yes according to the definition, the docker image is a kind of
"compiled-package".
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> 于2020年4月26日周日 下午9:15写道:
HI,
The docker image is made by the released binary file [1]. Even so, do we
still need a vote?
Well it depends on what you changed and where else you put it [1][2][3][4]
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-definition
2. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
3. https://infra.apache.org/release-distribution#public-distribution
4. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#compiled-packages
Re: The "latest" tag of IoTDB docker image has moved to
"0.9.1-jre8"
Posted by Dawei Liu <at...@163.com>.
Hi,
Sorry to Julian and Xiangdong,
As the v0.9.2 is released now, I think we need to move the "latest" tag to this version.
Let me know if there is any other issues.
Thanks
---
Dawei Liu
On 04/26/2020 21:37,Xiangdong Huang<sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Justin,
Thanks for reminding me.
Yes according to the definition, the docker image is a kind of
"compiled-package".
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> 于2020年4月26日周日 下午9:15写道:
HI,
The docker image is made by the released binary file [1]. Even so, do we
still need a vote?
Well it depends on what you changed and where else you put it [1][2][3][4]
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-definition
2. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
3. https://infra.apache.org/release-distribution#public-distribution
4. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#compiled-packages
Re: The "latest" tag of IoTDB docker image has moved to "0.9.1-jre8"
Posted by Xiangdong Huang <sa...@gmail.com>.
Hi Justin,
Thanks for reminding me.
Yes according to the definition, the docker image is a kind of
"compiled-package".
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> 于2020年4月26日周日 下午9:15写道:
> HI,
>
> > The docker image is made by the released binary file [1]. Even so, do we
> > still need a vote?
>
> Well it depends on what you changed and where else you put it [1][2][3][4]
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-definition
> 2. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
> 3. https://infra.apache.org/release-distribution#public-distribution
> 4. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#compiled-packages
>
>
Re: The "latest" tag of IoTDB docker image has moved to "0.9.1-jre8"
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
HI,
> The docker image is made by the released binary file [1]. Even so, do we
> still need a vote?
Well it depends on what you changed and where else you put it [1][2][3][4]
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-definition
2. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
3. https://infra.apache.org/release-distribution#public-distribution
4. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#compiled-packages
Re: The "latest" tag of IoTDB docker image has moved to "0.9.1-jre8"
Posted by Xiangdong Huang <sa...@gmail.com>.
Hi Justin,
The docker image is made by the released binary file [1]. Even so, do we
still need a vote?
[1]
https://www-us.apache.org/dist/incubator/iotdb/0.9.1-incubating/apache-iotdb-0.9.1-incubating-bin.zip
Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> 于2020年4月26日周日 下午8:01写道:
> Hi,
>
> > Julian reported that there were some issues in our docker image with tag
> > "0.9.1" [1] (though I did not reproduce any issues).
> > And, he provided a fixed version [2]. I tried the fixed version and it
> > works also well. Therefore, I uploaded it to docker hub tag with
> > "0.9.1-jre8" [3].
>
> If you ‘re releasing a new version of the software it’s best to vote on it.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
>
>
Re: The "latest" tag of IoTDB docker image has moved to "0.9.1-jre8"
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> Julian reported that there were some issues in our docker image with tag
> "0.9.1" [1] (though I did not reproduce any issues).
> And, he provided a fixed version [2]. I tried the fixed version and it
> works also well. Therefore, I uploaded it to docker hub tag with
> "0.9.1-jre8" [3].
If you ‘re releasing a new version of the software it’s best to vote on it.
Thanks,
Justin