You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by "mike st. john" <ms...@gmail.com> on 2013/09/09 00:43:59 UTC
multiple update processor chains.
is it possible to have multiple run by default?
i've tried adding multiple update.chains for the UpdateRequestHandler but
it didn't seem to work.
wondering if its even possible.
Thanks
msj
Re: multiple update processor chains.
Posted by "mike st. john" <ms...@gmail.com>.
Your correct, its not specifically for the update.chain. my mistake.
thanks
msj
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <ar...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Which section in the docs specifically? I thought it was multiple chains
> per config file, but you had to choose your specific chain for individual
> processors.
>
> I might be wrong though.
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
>
> Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
> - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at
> once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book)
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:51 PM, mike st. john <ms...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Alexandre,
> >
> > it was setup with multiple processors and working fine. I just noticed
> in
> > the docs, it mentioned you could have multiple chains, it seemed to make
> > sense to have the ability to chain the defined processors in order
> without
> > the need to merge them into a single update processor definition.
> >
> > thanks
> > msj
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
> > <ar...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> > > Only one chain per handler. But then you can define any sequence inside
> > the
> > > chain, so why do you care about multiple chains?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Alex.
> > >
> > > Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
> > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
> > > - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at
> > > once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD
> book)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:43 AM, mike st. john <ms...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > is it possible to have multiple run by default?
> > > >
> > > > i've tried adding multiple update.chains for the
> UpdateRequestHandler
> > > but
> > > > it didn't seem to work.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > wondering if its even possible.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > msj
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: multiple update processor chains.
Posted by Alexandre Rafalovitch <ar...@gmail.com>.
Which section in the docs specifically? I thought it was multiple chains
per config file, but you had to choose your specific chain for individual
processors.
I might be wrong though.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at
once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book)
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:51 PM, mike st. john <ms...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Alexandre,
>
> it was setup with multiple processors and working fine. I just noticed in
> the docs, it mentioned you could have multiple chains, it seemed to make
> sense to have the ability to chain the defined processors in order without
> the need to merge them into a single update processor definition.
>
> thanks
> msj
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
> <ar...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Only one chain per handler. But then you can define any sequence inside
> the
> > chain, so why do you care about multiple chains?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alex.
> >
> > Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
> > - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at
> > once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book)
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:43 AM, mike st. john <ms...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > is it possible to have multiple run by default?
> > >
> > > i've tried adding multiple update.chains for the UpdateRequestHandler
> > but
> > > it didn't seem to work.
> > >
> > >
> > > wondering if its even possible.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > msj
> > >
> >
>
Re: multiple update processor chains.
Posted by "mike st. john" <ms...@gmail.com>.
Alexandre,
it was setup with multiple processors and working fine. I just noticed in
the docs, it mentioned you could have multiple chains, it seemed to make
sense to have the ability to chain the defined processors in order without
the need to merge them into a single update processor definition.
thanks
msj
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
<ar...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Only one chain per handler. But then you can define any sequence inside the
> chain, so why do you care about multiple chains?
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
>
> Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
> - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at
> once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book)
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:43 AM, mike st. john <ms...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > is it possible to have multiple run by default?
> >
> > i've tried adding multiple update.chains for the UpdateRequestHandler
> but
> > it didn't seem to work.
> >
> >
> > wondering if its even possible.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > msj
> >
>
Re: multiple update processor chains.
Posted by Alexandre Rafalovitch <ar...@gmail.com>.
Only one chain per handler. But then you can define any sequence inside the
chain, so why do you care about multiple chains?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at
once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book)
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:43 AM, mike st. john <ms...@gmail.com> wrote:
> is it possible to have multiple run by default?
>
> i've tried adding multiple update.chains for the UpdateRequestHandler but
> it didn't seem to work.
>
>
> wondering if its even possible.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> msj
>