You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by "Roman Shaposhnik (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/01/11 01:39:00 UTC
[jira] [Closed] (LEGAL-595) Correct handling of a dual-licensed dependency
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Roman Shaposhnik closed LEGAL-595.
----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Seems like LEGAL-594 and the latest comment resolved this
> Correct handling of a dual-licensed dependency
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LEGAL-595
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-595
> Project: Legal Discuss
> Issue Type: Question
> Reporter: Chris Nauroth
> Priority: Major
>
> In ZOOKEEPER-4427, Apache ZooKeeper is considering adoption of Logback for logging infrastructure. Logback is dual-licensed under LGPL (category X/disallowed) and EPL (category B/allowable) [1].
> Does ZooKeeper need to do something specific to indicate that it chooses to adopt the terms of EPL, and not LGPL? Do we need particular phrasing in the ZooKeeper NOTICE.txt [2] to record our choice of EPL?
> [1] https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
> [2] https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/master/zookeeper-server/src/main/resources/NOTICE.txt
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org