You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by "Philippe Cuvecle (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/06/04 15:10:02 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-5208) ActiveMQ restart when Locker looses lock weakness

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Philippe Cuvecle updated AMQ-5208:
----------------------------------

    Component/s: Broker

> ActiveMQ restart when Locker looses lock weakness
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-5208
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5208
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 5.9.1
>            Reporter: Philippe Cuvecle
>
> The feature implemented in AMQ-4526 does not help if the restart does not succeed
> Imagine the following scenario : 2 AMQ configured with jdbcPersistenceAdapter
> - At the beginning AMQ1 is master, AMQ2 is slave
> - database targeted by jdbcPersistenceAdapter shutsdown or connectivity is lost
> - AMQ1 restarts but because DB is not back during restart it dies
> - AMQ2 tries to get the lock every 10s and stay alive
> - DB is back, AMQ2 becomes master
> - DB shutdown again, AMQ2 restart and dies for the same reason AMQ1 died
> -> We don't have any AMQ up
> When a lock is down why don't you just deny AMQ connections and retry to become master on a regular basis ?
> More generally how can we have a master/slave high availability configuration that can tolerate long storage unavailability ?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)