You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hive.apache.org by "Vihang Karajgaonkar (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/01/06 20:00:00 UTC
[jira] [Assigned] (HIVE-24594) results_cache_invalidation2.q is
flaky
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-24594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Vihang Karajgaonkar reassigned HIVE-24594:
------------------------------------------
> results_cache_invalidation2.q is flaky
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-24594
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-24594
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Test
> Reporter: Vihang Karajgaonkar
> Assignee: Vihang Karajgaonkar
> Priority: Minor
>
> results_cache_invalidation2.q failed for me couple of times on a unrelated PR. Here is the error log.
> {noformat}
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Test set: org.apache.hadoop.hive.cli.split19.TestMiniLlapLocalCliDriver
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tests run: 90, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 6, Time elapsed: 450.54 s <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.hadoop.hive.cli.split19.TestMiniLlapLocalCliDriver
> org.apache.hadoop.hive.cli.split19.TestMiniLlapLocalCliDriver.testCliDriver[results_cache_invalidation2] Time elapsed: 15.087 s <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError:
> Client Execution succeeded but contained differences (error code = 1) after executing results_cache_invalidation2.q ^M
> 266a267
> > #### A masked pattern was here ####
> 271a273
> > #### A masked pattern was here ####
> 273c275,276
> < Stage-0 is a root stage
> ---
> > Stage-1 is a root stage
> > Stage-0 depends on stages: Stage-1
> 275a279,365
> > Stage: Stage-1
> > Tez
> > #### A masked pattern was here ####
> > Edges:
> > Reducer 2 <- Map 1 (SIMPLE_EDGE), Map 4 (SIMPLE_EDGE)
> > Reducer 3 <- Reducer 2 (CUSTOM_SIMPLE_EDGE)
> > #### A masked pattern was here ####
> > Vertices:
> > Map 1
> > Map Operator Tree:
> > TableScan
> > alias: tab1
> > filterExpr: key is not null (type: boolean)
> > Statistics: Num rows: 1500 Data size: 130500 Basic stats: COMPLETE Column stats: COMPLETE
> > Filter Operator
> > predicate: key is not null (type: boolean)
> > Statistics: Num rows: 1500 Data size: 130500 Basic stats: COMPLETE Column stats: COMPLETE
> > Select Operator
> > expressions: key (type: string)
> > outputColumnNames: _col0
> > Statistics: Num rows: 1500 Data size: 130500 Basic stats: COMPLETE Column stats: COMPLETE
> > Reduce Output Operator
> > key expressions: _col0 (type: string)
> > null sort order: z
> > sort order: +
> > Map-reduce partition columns: _col0 (type: string)
> > Statistics: Num rows: 1500 Data size: 130500 Basic stats: COMPLETE Column stats: COMPLETE
> > Execution mode: vectorized, llap
> > LLAP IO: all inputs
> > Map 4
> > Map Operator Tree:
> > TableScan
> > alias: tab2
> > filterExpr: key is not null (type: boolean)
> > Statistics: Num rows: 500 Data size: 43500 Basic stats: COMPLETE Column stats: COMPLETE
> > Fil^M
> {noformat}
> The test works for me locally. In fact the same PR had a successful run of this test in a previous commit. I think we should disable this and re-enable it after fixing the flakiness.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)