You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@nutch.apache.org by Nicolás Lichtmaier <ni...@reloco.com.ar> on 2007/02/01 15:54:23 UTC
Re: Fetcher threads & automation
> The default is 1 also because of netiquette - it's generally frowned
> upon by webmasters if someone uses more than 1 concurrent request, or
> makes requests too often (without any delay) - and quite often all
> requests from such sources get blocked at the firewall level -
> sometimes, even whole IP classes get blocked.
>
> So, t(h)read carefully ...
Web browsers have traditionally used connections at the same time, so
that shoul be a reasonable number to use and one that shouldn't get you
blocked.
Re: Fetcher threads & automation
Posted by Andrzej Bialecki <ab...@getopt.org>.
Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
>
>> The default is 1 also because of netiquette - it's generally frowned
>> upon by webmasters if someone uses more than 1 concurrent request, or
>> makes requests too often (without any delay) - and quite often all
>> requests from such sources get blocked at the firewall level -
>> sometimes, even whole IP classes get blocked.
>>
>> So, t(h)read carefully ...
>
> Web browsers have traditionally used connections at the same time, so
> that shoul be a reasonable number to use and one that shouldn't get
> you blocked.
But web browsers don't crawl a single site exhaustively and quickly,
rather they make a bunch of requests for resources tied to a single
page, then wait relatively long time, and then make another bunch of
requests ... So, the request pattern is still more "fair" than in the
case of a mad crawler.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com