You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Per Jessen <pe...@computer.org> on 2010/09/16 07:28:29 UTC
The most amazing spam ...
http://public.jessen.ch/files/mazeweb-spam.jpeg
/Per Jessen, Zürich
Re: The most amazing spam ...
Posted by Per Jessen <pe...@computer.org>.
Giles Coochey wrote:
> On Thu, September 16, 2010 15:57, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 13:36 +0200, Giles Coochey wrote:
>>> On Thu, September 16, 2010 13:28, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>>> > On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 07:28 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
>>> >> http://public.jessen.ch/files/mazeweb-spam.jpeg
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> > A cynic might wonder whether it also harvests valid e-mail
>>> > addresses.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Appears to be a perfectly reputable service to me... what makes you
>>> think
>>> there is anything untoward?
>>>
>> An anti-spammer spamming? C'mon!
>>
>
> They must know their stuff if spamassassin didn't catch it.
Not much to know really - it was a very ordinary email, scored barely
1.4 points. It was DKIM signed, verified, failed SPF because it was
forwarded via ieee.org.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
Re: The most amazing spam ...
Posted by Giles Coochey <gi...@coochey.net>.
On Thu, September 16, 2010 15:57, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 13:36 +0200, Giles Coochey wrote:
>> On Thu, September 16, 2010 13:28, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 07:28 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
>> >> http://public.jessen.ch/files/mazeweb-spam.jpeg
>> >>
>> >>
>> > A cynic might wonder whether it also harvests valid e-mail addresses.
>> >
>>
>> Appears to be a perfectly reputable service to me... what makes you
>> think
>> there is anything untoward?
>>
> An anti-spammer spamming? C'mon!
>
They must know their stuff if spamassassin didn't catch it.
Re: The most amazing spam ...
Posted by Martin Gregorie <ma...@gregorie.org>.
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 13:36 +0200, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On Thu, September 16, 2010 13:28, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 07:28 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> >> http://public.jessen.ch/files/mazeweb-spam.jpeg
> >>
> >>
> > A cynic might wonder whether it also harvests valid e-mail addresses.
> >
>
> Appears to be a perfectly reputable service to me... what makes you think
> there is anything untoward?
>
An anti-spammer spamming? C'mon!
Martin
Re: The most amazing spam ...
Posted by Yet Another Ninja <sa...@alexb.ch>.
On 2010-09-16 13:36, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On Thu, September 16, 2010 13:28, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 07:28 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
>>> http://public.jessen.ch/files/mazeweb-spam.jpeg
>>>
>>>
>> A cynic might wonder whether it also harvests valid e-mail addresses.
>>
>
> Appears to be a perfectly reputable service to me... what makes you think
> there is anything untoward?
>
I'd say: a spam filter service spamming the competition :-)
Re: The most amazing spam ...
Posted by Giles Coochey <gi...@coochey.net>.
On Thu, September 16, 2010 13:28, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 07:28 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
>> http://public.jessen.ch/files/mazeweb-spam.jpeg
>>
>>
> A cynic might wonder whether it also harvests valid e-mail addresses.
>
Appears to be a perfectly reputable service to me... what makes you think
there is anything untoward?
Re: The most amazing spam ...
Posted by Martin Gregorie <ma...@gregorie.org>.
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 07:28 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> http://public.jessen.ch/files/mazeweb-spam.jpeg
>
>
A cynic might wonder whether it also harvests valid e-mail addresses.
Martin