You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/07/31 06:07:51 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30422] New: - [Patch] Mutual Exclusion Tasks

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30422>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30422

[Patch] Mutual Exclusion Tasks

           Summary: [Patch] Mutual Exclusion Tasks
           Product: Ant
           Version: 1.6.2
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Enhancement
          Priority: Other
         Component: Core tasks
        AssignedTo: dev@ant.apache.org
        ReportedBy: dak@dotech.com


I've created 2 tasks <Wait> and <Notify>.
The use case is where you have parallel ants running (on some server) doing
builds, but 1 part of the build (in our case, some JFCUnit) needs to be single
threaded. By this I mean that each of the build/validates that we are doing can
run in parallel, with the exception of the JFCUnit portion due to focus
issues.

So, wrap the JFCUnit portion of the validate in the <Wait> <Notify> tasks. What
wait does is create a lock file, check for other locks, of none exist, it goes
forward. If other locks exist, it removes its lock file and does a random wait
(based on parameters) and tries again. <Notify> simply removes the lock.

I have a test build file and the working tasks if anyone wants to see and play
around.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org