You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jira@kafka.apache.org by "Guozhang Wang (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/12/08 21:53:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-13500) Consider adding a dedicated standby consumer

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17456008#comment-17456008 ] 

Guozhang Wang commented on KAFKA-13500:
---------------------------------------

I'm wondering if it could be subsumed by the restoration thread JIRA ticket?

> Consider adding a dedicated standby consumer
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-13500
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13500
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: streams
>            Reporter: Matthias J. Sax
>            Priority: Minor
>
> We currently use the restore consumer to recover state for active tasks and to maintain standby tasks during regular processing. This setup has a few disadvantages
>  # During state recovery, we might want to apply different consumer configs compared to standby maintenance during regular processing.
>  # It make monitoring confusing: because we never commit offsets for changelog topics, users can only monitor the client's "lag metric" to observer restore progress (without the need to register a restore listener). However, if they are interesting in a restore metric, during regular processing it would report the standby lag, which can be rather confusing.
> Because the restore consumer does not use consumer group management, it seems to be low overhead to actually use a third consumer, because there won't be any heartbeat thread.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)