svn commit: r1331172 - /openejb/site/trunk/content/jndi-names.mdtext

[vi...@apache.org]

Author: vishwanathk
Date: Fri Apr 27 01:35:59 2012
New Revision: 1331172

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1331172&view=rev
Log:
correct docs

Modified:
    openejb/site/trunk/content/jndi-names.mdtext

Modified: openejb/site/trunk/content/jndi-names.mdtext
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openejb/site/trunk/content/jndi-names.mdtext?rev=1331172&r1=1331171&r2=1331172&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- openejb/site/trunk/content/jndi-names.mdtext (original)
+++ openejb/site/trunk/content/jndi-names.mdtext Fri Apr 27 01:35:59 2012
@@ -246,14 +246,14 @@ your bean had a legacy EJBObject interfa
 interfaces, and two business local interfaces, this pattern would result in
 *six* proxies bound into JNDI.
 
-<pre>{deploymentId}/{interfaceClass.simpleName}
+{deploymentId}/{interfaceClass.simpleName}
 {moduleId}/{ejbName}/{interfaceClass}
 {ejbName}/{interfaceClass}
 {moduleId}/{ejbClass}/{interfaceClass}
 {ejbClass}/{interfaceClass}
 {ejbClass}/{interfaceClass.simpleName}
 {ejbClass.simpleName}/{interfaceClass.simpleName}
-{interfaceClass}/{ejbName}</pre>
+{interfaceClass}/{ejbName}
 
 Bordeline optimistic:    
 <pre>