You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@syncope.apache.org by Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org> on 2012/05/08 15:36:06 UTC
[DISCUSS] Apache Syncope 1.0.0-RC1-incubating / 5th attempt
Discussion thread for vote on 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with SVN
source tag (r1335495).
For more information on the release process, check out
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
Some of the things to check before voting are:
- does "mvn apache-rat:check" pass on the source
- can you build the contents of source release (both .zip and .tar.gz)
and SVN tag
- do all of the staged jars/wars/tar.gz/zips contain the required
LICENSE and NOTICE files
- are all of the staged jars/wars/tar.gz/zips signed and the signature
verifiable
- is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server
(i.e. http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/syncope/)
Regards.
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Apache Cocoon PMC and Apache Syncope PPMC Member
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
R: [DISCUSS] Apache Syncope 1.0.0-RC1-incubating / 5th attempt
Posted by Denis Signoretto <de...@intesys.it>.
+1
>
> Discussion thread for vote on 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with SVN
> source tag (r1335495).
>
> For more information on the release process, check out
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>
> Some of the things to check before voting are:
> - does "mvn apache-rat:check" pass on the source
> - can you build the contents of source release (both .zip
> and .tar.gz)
> and SVN tag
> - do all of the staged jars/wars/tar.gz/zips contain the required
> LICENSE and NOTICE files
> - are all of the staged jars/wars/tar.gz/zips signed and
> the signature
> verifiable
> - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a
> public server
> (i.e. http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/syncope/)
>
> Regards.
>
> --
> Francesco Chicchiriccò
>
> Apache Cocoon PMC and Apache Syncope PPMC Member
> http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
>
>
R: SMPL Support
Posted by Denis Signoretto <de...@intesys.it>.
Sorry, I wrote a wrong Subject,
please follow up on the right repost.
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Denis Signoretto [mailto:denis.signoretto@intesys.it]
> Inviato: martedì 8 maggio 2012 15.47
> A: syncope-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Oggetto: SMPL Support
>
>
>
> Hi Everybody,
>
> in Syncope Roadmap, even though Rest API it'a fastest approach,
> do you already evaluated introduction of standard SPML
> suppport (ref. [1])?
>
> Bye,
> Denis.
>
> [1]
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=provision
> [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_Provisioning_Markup_Language
>
>
R: SPML Support
Posted by Denis Signoretto <de...@intesys.it>.
Hi Francesco and Fabio,
I agree with you. Actually SPML it's not an essential feature,
and I think that roadmap items priority it's correct
(there are more important features to implement and
Rest and Java API can already cover integration issue).
Which standard is the best to implement it's difficult to say,
reading [4] SCIM should be better so, in this moment,
I think that the decision can be postponed ;).
Bye,
Denis
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgrosso@apache.org]
> Inviato: martedì 8 maggio 2012 16.20
> A: syncope-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Oggetto: Re: SPML Support
>
>
> On 08/05/2012 16:16, Fabio Martelli wrote:
> > Il giorno 08/mag/2012, alle ore 15.48, Denis Signoretto ha scritto:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi Everybody,
> >>
> >> in Syncope Roadmap, even though Rest API it'a fastest approach,
> >> do you already evaluated introduction of standard SPML
> >> suppport (ref. [1])?
> > Hi Denis,
> > we already evaluated SPML at the beginning of the project.
> > At that time the adoption of this standard seemed to be a
> little bit in reduction so we thoughts that the effort to
> implement a SPML interface for Syncope was unjustified.
> > Personally, today I think the same and a simple search with
> google give me a sort of confirmation to my idea.
>
> It seems instead [3] [4] that another emerging standard should be
> supported: SCIM.
>
> In my opinion, the effort to implement SPML or SCIM could
> roughly be the
> same, hence I would prefer the latter.
> WDYT?
>
> >> [1]
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=provision
> >> [2]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_Provisioning_Markup_Language
[3] http://idlogger.me/2012/01/13/thoughts-on-scim/
[4] http://blog.sailpoint.com/2011/12/scim/
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Apache Cocoon PMC and Apache Syncope PPMC Member
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: SPML Support
Posted by Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org>.
On 08/05/2012 16:16, Fabio Martelli wrote:
> Il giorno 08/mag/2012, alle ore 15.48, Denis Signoretto ha scritto:
>
>>
>> Hi Everybody,
>>
>> in Syncope Roadmap, even though Rest API it'a fastest approach,
>> do you already evaluated introduction of standard SPML
>> suppport (ref. [1])?
> Hi Denis,
> we already evaluated SPML at the beginning of the project.
> At that time the adoption of this standard seemed to be a little bit in reduction so we thoughts that the effort to implement a SPML interface for Syncope was unjustified.
> Personally, today I think the same and a simple search with google give me a sort of confirmation to my idea.
It seems instead [3] [4] that another emerging standard should be
supported: SCIM.
In my opinion, the effort to implement SPML or SCIM could roughly be the
same, hence I would prefer the latter.
WDYT?
>> [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=provision
>> [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_Provisioning_Markup_Language
[3] http://idlogger.me/2012/01/13/thoughts-on-scim/
[4] http://blog.sailpoint.com/2011/12/scim/
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Apache Cocoon PMC and Apache Syncope PPMC Member
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: SPML Support
Posted by Fabio Martelli <fa...@gmail.com>.
Il giorno 08/mag/2012, alle ore 15.48, Denis Signoretto ha scritto:
>
>
> Hi Everybody,
>
> in Syncope Roadmap, even though Rest API it'a fastest approach,
> do you already evaluated introduction of standard SPML
> suppport (ref. [1])?
Hi Denis,
we already evaluated SPML at the beginning of the project.
At that time the adoption of this standard seemed to be a little bit in reduction so we thoughts that the effort to implement a SPML interface for Syncope was unjustified.
Personally, today I think the same and a simple search with google give me a sort of confirmation to my idea.
Regards,
F.
> Bye,
> Denis.
>
> [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=provision
> [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_Provisioning_Markup_Language
>
>
SPML Support
Posted by Denis Signoretto <de...@intesys.it>.
Hi Everybody,
in Syncope Roadmap, even though Rest API it'a fastest approach,
do you already evaluated introduction of standard SPML
suppport (ref. [1])?
Bye,
Denis.
[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=provision
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_Provisioning_Markup_Language
SMPL Support
Posted by Denis Signoretto <de...@intesys.it>.
Hi Everybody,
in Syncope Roadmap, even though Rest API it'a fastest approach,
do you already evaluated introduction of standard SPML suppport (ref. [1])?
Bye,
Denis.
[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=provision
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_Provisioning_Markup_Language