You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lens.apache.org by "Hudson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/02/06 05:54:02 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (LENS-1430) Expressions are not getting resolved correctly in union query

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16353381#comment-16353381 ] 

Hudson commented on LENS-1430:
------------------------------

FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build Lens-Commit #1458 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Lens-Commit/1458/])
LENS-1430 : Expressions are not getting resolved correctly in union (sushilmohanty: rev be75e1d5571f33ca1ec51f91a5d113abe0838842)
* (edit) lens-cube/src/test/resources/schema/facts/union_join_ctx_fact1.xml
* (edit) lens-cube/src/test/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/TestUnionAndJoinCandidates.java
* (edit) lens-cube/src/test/resources/schema/cubes/derived/union_join_ctx_der1.xml
* (edit) lens-cube/src/test/resources/schema/facts/union_join_ctx_fact3.xml
* (edit) lens-cube/src/test/resources/schema/cubes/base/basecube.xml
* (edit) lens-cube/src/test/resources/schema/cubes/base/testcube.xml
* (edit) lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/ExpressionResolver.java
* (add) lens-cube/src/test/resources/schema/facts/union_join_ctx_fact4.xml


> Expressions are not getting resolved correctly in union query
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LENS-1430
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1430
>             Project: Apache Lens
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: cube
>            Reporter: Sushil Mohanty
>            Assignee: Sushil Mohanty
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.7
>
>         Attachments: LENS-1430.patch, LENS-1430_1.patch
>
>
> Expressions are not getting resolved correctly for the below case
> {CODE} 
> case when expr1 = 0 then 0 else expr2 * 100 / expr1 end 
> {CODE}
> expr1 is answerable by Candidate1 and Candidate2
> expr2 is answerable by Candidate1 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)