[jira] Updated: (DIRSERVER-169) Incorrect SearchResult name and "compare" failure using CoreContextFactory

["Alex Karasulu (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Alex Karasulu updated DIRSERVER-169:
------------------------------------

    Affects Version/s: 1.0.2
                       1.0
                       1.0-RC4
                       1.0-RC3
                       1.0-RC2
                       1.0-RC1
                       pre-1.0

I don't think it's worth making this change for 1.0.x considering the possible destablization that may result.  It's best that we fix this issue in the 1.5.x branch where we have the freedom to refactor for it.

> Incorrect SearchResult name and "compare" failure using CoreContextFactory
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRSERVER-169
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-169
>             Project: Directory ApacheDS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.2, 1.0.1, 1.5.0, 1.0, 1.0-RC4, 1.0-RC3, 1.0-RC2, 1.0-RC1, pre-1.0
>         Environment: OS X,
> java version "1.5.0_05"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_05-83)
> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_05-48, mixed mode, sharing)
>            Reporter: Luke Taylor
>         Assigned To: Alex Karasulu
>             Fix For: 1.5.1, 1.0.2
>
>         Attachments: DIRSERVER169TestCase.java, LdapTestServer.java, TestCase.zip
>
>
> Attached is a test case following on from my post a while back to the mailing list, viz:
> My setup is like this:
> I have a simple DIT with a root "dc=acegisecurity,dc=org". This has two subcontexts "ou=people" and "ou=groups" for my users and roles respectively. When the test base class instantiated, I create a
> MutableStartupConfiguration and add a partition to it with the suffix "dc=acegisecurity,dc=org". I then create a context with this configuration as follows:
>     env.setProperty( Context.PROVIDER_URL, "dc=acegisecurity,dc=org" );
>     env.setProperty( Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY,
>              CoreContextFactory.class.getName());
>     env.putAll( cfg.toJndiEnvironment() );
>     serverContext = new InitialDirContext( env );
> When I need a context in my tests it is created the same way.
> Bind authentication works fine in both scenarios. I have problems with two things when trying to use CoreContextFactory :
> 1. The name returned by a search. When I do a search for a user in the directory, I get back the full DN rather than the name relative to the context I search in. So if I call
>    ctx.search("ou=people", "(uid={0})", new String[] {"bob"}, ctls);
> on a context obtained as above, I get back a SearchResult with name
> "uid=bob,ou=people,dc=acegisecurity,dc=org"
> whereas with the full server (or OpenLDAP) I get
> "uid=bob"
> as expected. This then unfortunately leads to an attempt to bind with an an unknown DN which causes the infinite recursion problem.
> 2. Performing "compare" operations. I had problems with this before, as reported in
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRLDAP-77
> but this now works with the full server, thanks to Emmanuel's speedy response. Running the same search code against a context obtained from CoreContextFactory fails however. A compare is never performed and the search returns an empty enumeration. Is there some way I can get my client code (as posted in JIRA):
>      SearchControls ctls = new SearchControls();
>      ctls.setReturningAttributes(new String[0]);
>      ctls.setSearchScope(SearchControls.OBJECT_SCOPE);
>      String filter = "(userPassword={0})";
>      NamingEnumeration results = ctx.search(dn, filter, new
>            Object[]{password.getBytes()}, ctls);
> to trigger a compare call on the context? The compare/search also fails for non-binary attributes.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.