You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@mynewt.apache.org by "Christopher Collins (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/07/09 23:36:10 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (MYNEWT-323) Newt - Build options precedence
hierarchy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYNEWT-323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Christopher Collins resolved MYNEWT-323.
----------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Christopher Collins
Precedence is defined as specified in the ticket description. This feature applies to the following package settings:
* cflags
* aflags
* lflags
> Newt - Build options precedence hierarchy
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: MYNEWT-323
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYNEWT-323
> Project: Mynewt
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Newt
> Reporter: Christopher Collins
> Assignee: Christopher Collins
> Fix For: v0_10_0
>
>
> When two packages specify conflicting build options, it is undefined which one takes effect. Worse, if two packages specify conflicting cflags (e.g., "-DLOG_LEVEL=0" and "-DLOG_LEVEL=1"), gcc reports an error and aborts the build.
> We should enforce a well-defined precedence hierarchy. I'm thinking something like this (lowest priority first):
> * Library
> * BSP
> * App
> * Target
> In the case of conflicting options, newt should discard all but the highest priority. Newt would need to do some simple parsing of cflags to identity conflicts.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)