You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@storm.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/07/01 16:01:11 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (STORM-1886) Extend KeyValueState interface with delete method

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15359182#comment-15359182 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1886:
---------------------------------------

Github user kosii commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1470#discussion_r69321335
  
    --- Diff: external/storm-redis/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/redis/state/RedisKeyValueState.java ---
    @@ -60,22 +64,23 @@ public RedisKeyValueState(String namespace) {
         }
     
         public RedisKeyValueState(String namespace, JedisPoolConfig poolConfig) {
    -        this(namespace, poolConfig, new DefaultStateSerializer<K>(), new DefaultStateSerializer<V>());
    +        this(namespace, poolConfig, new DefaultStateSerializer<K>(), new DefaultStateSerializer<Optional<V>>());
         }
     
    -    public RedisKeyValueState(String namespace, JedisPoolConfig poolConfig, Serializer<K> keySerializer, Serializer<V> valueSerializer) {
    +    public RedisKeyValueState(String namespace, JedisPoolConfig poolConfig, Serializer<K> keySerializer, Serializer<Optional<V>> valueSerializer) {
    --- End diff --
    
    by having a `private final Serializer<Optional<V>> internalValueSerializer`?


> Extend KeyValueState interface with delete method
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STORM-1886
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1886
>             Project: Apache Storm
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Balazs Kossovics
>
> Even if the implementation of checkpointing only uses the get/put methods of the KeyValueState interface, the existance of a delete method could be really useful in the general case.
> I made a first implementation, what do you think about?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)