You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org> on 2009/10/08 21:44:22 UTC
On ADVANCE_FEE subrules
Is there a strong reason for having the ADVANCE_FEE subrules named
__FRAUD_{random} rather than giving them a descriptive name?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The yardstick you should use when considering whether to support a
given piece of legislation is "what if my worst enemy is chosen to
administer this law?"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
7 days since a sunspot last seen - EPA blames CO2 emissions
Re: On ADVANCE_FEE subrules
Posted by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>.
nope!
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 20:44, John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org> wrote:
> Is there a strong reason for having the ADVANCE_FEE subrules named
> __FRAUD_{random} rather than giving them a descriptive name?
>
> --
> John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
> jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
> key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The yardstick you should use when considering whether to support a
> given piece of legislation is "what if my worst enemy is chosen to
> administer this law?"
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 7 days since a sunspot last seen - EPA blames CO2 emissions
>
>
--
--j.