You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Manu T George (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/09/16 20:28:32 UTC

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3452) Stateless Session EJBs cannot contain a remove() method

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12527890 ] 

Manu T George commented on GERONIMO-3452:
-----------------------------------------

Patched in openejb trunk and in 3.0-beta-1

> Stateless Session EJBs cannot contain a remove() method
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-3452
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3452
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: OpenEJB
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.x
>         Environment: Windows XP SP2
>            Reporter: Aman Nanner
>             Fix For: 2.0.x, 2.1
>
>
> We have a stateless session bean that contains a "remove(...)" method that takes in a specific type of array as a parameter.  It seems that the EJBObjectProxyHandler confuses this custom business method with the Entity Bean "remove(...)" method.  Once the logic sees that a method called "remove" is being called, it assumes that it is a "special" method instead of a business method.  Here is a stack trace up to the point where this piece of logic occurs:
> {panel}
> Thread [http-80-3] (Suspended)	
> 	StatelessEjbObjectHandler(EjbObjectProxyHandler)._invoke(Object, Class, Method, Object[]) line: 62	
> 	StatelessEjbObjectHandler(BaseEjbProxyHandler).invoke(Object, Method, Object[]) line: 320	
> 	Jdk13InvocationHandler.invoke(Object, Method, Object[]) line: 49	
> 	$Proxy173.remove(FcModelKey[]) line: not available	
> 	FCRemoveTest.test() line: 75	
> 	....
> {panel}
> The following code in the EjbObjectProxyHandler looks up the name of the method from the dispatch table and sees that it is a "special" method name.  However, this really only applies to Entity beans and not Session Beans.  Therefore, case 4 is executed, and the StatelessEjbObjectHandler.remove(...) method is called, which is empty and only returns null.
> {code}
>             Integer operation = (Integer) dispatchTable.get(m.getName());
>             if (operation == null) {
>                 retValue = businessMethod(interfce, m, a, p);
>             } else {
>                 switch (operation.intValue()) {
>                     case 1:
>                         retValue = getHandle(m, a, p);
>                         break;
>                     case 2:
>                         retValue = getPrimaryKey(m, a, p);
>                         break;
>                     case 3:
>                         retValue = isIdentical(m, a, p);
>                         break;
>                     case 4:
>                         retValue = remove(interfce, m, a, p);
>                         break;
>                     case 5:
>                         retValue = getEJBHome(m, a, p);
>                         break;
>                     case 6:
>                         retValue = getEJBLocalHome(m, a, p);
>                         break;
>                     default:
>                         throw new RuntimeException("Inconsistent internal state");
>                 }
>             }
>             return retValue;
> {code}
> We have not run into this problem with JBoss and Weblogic.  I do not believe having a method called "remove" on a Stateless Session bean is in violation of any spec, so this should work.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.