You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@arrow.apache.org by Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> on 2021/10/13 19:42:29 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Tomorrow October 14 would be the next 16:00 Rust sync up.
However, we don't seem to have anything on the agenda[1]
Would anyone like to propose topics? Or shall we skip this time ? Maybe
monthly would be a better cadence?
Andrew
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:46 PM Jiayu Liu <ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Andrew for facilitating this meeting and very happy to "meet"
> everyone on the call. Hope you have a great day / evening.
>
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:38 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
>
> > Notes from the 16:00 UTC Call:
> >
> > Attendees:
> > Andrew Lamb
> > Shen Yi Jie
> > Matt Turner
> > Zied BF
> > Remi Dettai
> > Rich
> > Ruihang
> > Jaiyu Liu
> > QP
> > Jorn Horstmann
> > Benson Muite
> >
> > Introductions (20 minutes)
> >
> > Discussion Items (10 minutes):
> > * Interest in python binding, though it is lagging behind
> > * Thoughts on boundaries between Arrow, DataFusion and Ballista
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:29 AM Benson Muite <
> benson_muite@emailplus.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Attendees:
> > >
> > > Ruihang
> > > Benson
> > >
> > > Discussion items:
> > >
> > > Self-introduction
> > > OpenVidu seemed to work
> > > Data Fusion introduction
> > > Speed of Arrow development process and intended use cases
> > > Maybe get time zones of attendees?
> > >
> > > On 9/30/21 6:58 AM, Benson Muite wrote:
> > > > Join link:
> > > >
> > > > https://mkutano.nairuby.org/#/soft-amaranth-alpaca
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sorry it is late. Meeting should be short, as it seems there is a
> > > > preference for one meeting.
> > > >
> > > > On 9/29/21 10:59 AM, Benson Muite wrote:
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at 3:45 UTC
> > > >> tomorrow.
> > > >>
> > > >> Update the google doc [1]
> > > >>
> > > >> Would be helpful to know if having 2 meetings on the same day, or
> > > >> alternating the meeting time will work best for most people.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Benson
> > > >>
> > > >> [1]
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 9/24/21 4:26 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > >>> Thank you!
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite
> > > >>> <be...@emailplus.org>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video
> conferencing
> > > >>>> solution that should just work in the browser.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Benson
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > >>>>> The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not typically
> > > >>>>> available
> > > >>>> at
> > > >>>>> 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please
> arrange
> > > >>>>> that.
> > > >>>>> Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can
> adjust
> > > >>>>> schedules or technology as needed:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting September
> > > >>>>> 30, 2021
> > > >>>>> Location: Zoom [2]
> > > >>>>> Agenda: Google docs [1]
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> We will send a summary of all sync ups to the mailing list. I
> have
> > > >>>>> also
> > > >>>>> proposed adding this information to the website [3]
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>> Andrew
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> [1]
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> [2]
> > > >>>>> Topic: Apache Arrow Rust Syncup (arrow, datafusion ballista, etc)
> > > >>>>> Time:
> > > >>>> Sep
> > > >>>>> 30, 2021 04:00 PM Universal Time UTC
> > > >>>>> https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1042/files
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Posted by Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>.
There are a few interesting topics that I think would make a good sync up
in the sync document. For personal reasons I can no longer host such
meetings on Thursdays for a while but I would like to propose one for next
Wednesday March 20, 2022 at 15:00 UTC. Please see the document for more
details and to offer comments.
I also want to remind the community that anyone should feel free to
organize meetups on days / timezones that work well for them and publicize
them in the document, in the slack channel and on the mailing list.
Andrew
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 4:56 PM Bob Tinsman <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just missed the call, but I watched the recording (thank you to Andrew
> for posting [1]). Really interesting!
> I'm diving into Arrow because I have some previous experience with
> in-memory query engines. I'm following discussions around improving
> performance and adding features so I can determine how best to contribute.
>
> In particular, I was interested in some of the background for the JIT
> implementation [2] and the row format [3] but I guess I'm missing context.
> I saw the comment in #1708 [4] that "many pipeline-breaking operators are
> inherently row-based".
> My questions:
> - By "pipeline-breaking" I assume you mean "very slow", but can you give me
> details? Does this arise from some particular observation, or other
> reported issues?
> - An example would be nice, like "select a, b, c from blah order by d"
> with table "blah" having 1 million rows and 10 columns takes 5 minutes, or
> even anecdotal evidence like mailing list discussions
> - In general, what tools are you using to analyze datafusion performance?
> - The criterion benchmarks are nice but do you have anything higher-level
> which exercises a broad range of workloads?
> - How much profiling have you done to identify bottlenecks?
>
> To be honest, I was kind of surprised to see using a row format to solve a
> performance problem, but I figured you must have good reasons, and I'm
> still getting my brain around datafusion's query execution model. Thanks
> for any illumination!
>
> [1] https://youtu.be/5NJcqXm6uE0
> [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1849
> [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1782
> [4] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1708
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 12:25 PM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
>
> > I am not sure if everyone saw it in the agenda[1], but we plan to have a
> > meeting tomorrow. I'll plan to record it for anyone who can not make this
> > time.
> >
> > 15:00 UTC Wednesday March 9, 2022
> > Meeting Location: (in agenda)
> > Matthew Turner: focused on JIT and row representation, next Wednesday,
> > March 9th,
> > @yijie: JIT overview
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 12:50 AM Benson Muite <benson_muite@emailplus.org
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Interested in learning more about this. Can work through the code and
> > > discuss on 17 March either 4:00 or 16:00 UTC.
> > >
> > > Benson
> > >
> > > On 3/3/22 12:03 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > > I noticed that Matthew Turner added a note to the agenda[1] for a
> walk
> > > > through of the JIT code. I would be interested in this as well --
> would
> > > > anyone plan to be on the call and discuss it?
> > > >
> > > > I don't think I have time to prepare that content prior
> > > >
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Performance Measurements (was Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?)
Posted by Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>.
>
>
> > > - By "pipeline-breaking" I assume you mean "very slow", but can you
> give
> > me
> > details? Does this arise from some particular observation, or other
> > reported issues?
> >
> > In general pipeline breaking means that the output of the operator can't
> be
> > produced until it has seen *ALL* its input.
> >
> > For example, a sort (ORDER BY x) is a pipeline breaker because the engine
> > has to see the entire input prior to being able to produce any output.
> >
> > However, a filter (WHERE x > 500) is not a pipeline breaker because the
> > operator can produce output rows as soon as it sees any that pass the
> > filter criteria.
> >
>
> Aha, I get it--so the goal is not necessarily to speed up the whole thing
> but to be able to send output to the next processing stage sooner.
> So IIRC besides sorts, the other types of queries mentioned were joins,
> group by, and hash aggregates?
>
Yes. DataFusion uses hash aggregates today to implement GROUP BY so I
probably wouldn't describe them as different types of queries.
>
> >
> > > - In general, what tools are you using to analyze datafusion
> performance?
> >
> > The tools used most commonly are in the benchmark directory [1] There is
> > some other work
> >
> > > - How much profiling have you done to identify bottlenecks?
> >
> > I would say it is done on an "as needed basis" -- namely someone runs a
> > query that is important to them and then improves whatever hotspot they
> may
> > find.
> >
> > However, we don't have regular runs of the same queries or automatically
> > gather data over time. dianaclarke added integration for condabench in
> [2]
> > that I think would allow for such data collection, but no one has hooked
> up
> > the benchmarks to it uet.
> >
> > Getting regular runs of the performance benchmark up and running would be
> > very valuable indeed, if you were looking to help.
> >
> > Yes, I'm definitely looking to help, and maybe getting more perf
> benchmarks up would be a good way of starting.
> I noticed that matthewmturner was working on something to run benchmarks in
> docker, which is pretty nice! [3]
> Any suggestions for performance use cases would be welcome; I could add
> them in.
> One thing I like to do is to run the same benchmark and tweak the knobs,
> such as number of rows, cardinality, etc. because the effects can vary A
> LOT.
>
I agree this is a great strategy. I don't think there is any reason we
can't do this to DataFusion, but no one has yet invested the time into a
systematic investigation.
I am tempted to venture opinions on how to do things based on my experience
> building my own (closed-source) columnar query engine, but that one is an
> entirely different beast, so I am not qualified to opine until I learn
> more.
> I'm starting to follow history about various performance improvements, but
> if anyone has any suggestion, like "I wish datafusion could complete X
> query on 50 bazillion rows in less than 3 days", let me know. In
> performance, there are so many variables that it's hard to know where to
> start.
>
>
I think the TPCH queries would be a great place to start. Specifically,
getting to the point where we had a baseline number at Scale Factor 1 would
be great. DataFusion doesn't run some of them due to lack of various
features, but I can't remember how well they are tracked. Getting DF to the
point where all the queries complete in a "reasonable" amount of time would
be pretty awesome
Andrew
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Performance Measurements (was Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?)
Posted by Bob Tinsman <bo...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for pulling this out from the long thread...
On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 3:06 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> > - By "pipeline-breaking" I assume you mean "very slow", but can you give
> me
> details? Does this arise from some particular observation, or other
> reported issues?
>
> In general pipeline breaking means that the output of the operator can't be
> produced until it has seen *ALL* its input.
>
> For example, a sort (ORDER BY x) is a pipeline breaker because the engine
> has to see the entire input prior to being able to produce any output.
>
> However, a filter (WHERE x > 500) is not a pipeline breaker because the
> operator can produce output rows as soon as it sees any that pass the
> filter criteria.
>
Aha, I get it--so the goal is not necessarily to speed up the whole thing
but to be able to send output to the next processing stage sooner.
So IIRC besides sorts, the other types of queries mentioned were joins,
group by, and hash aggregates?
>
> > - In general, what tools are you using to analyze datafusion performance?
>
> The tools used most commonly are in the benchmark directory [1] There is
> some other work
>
> > - How much profiling have you done to identify bottlenecks?
>
> I would say it is done on an "as needed basis" -- namely someone runs a
> query that is important to them and then improves whatever hotspot they may
> find.
>
> However, we don't have regular runs of the same queries or automatically
> gather data over time. dianaclarke added integration for condabench in [2]
> that I think would allow for such data collection, but no one has hooked up
> the benchmarks to it uet.
>
> Getting regular runs of the performance benchmark up and running would be
> very valuable indeed, if you were looking to help.
>
> Yes, I'm definitely looking to help, and maybe getting more perf
benchmarks up would be a good way of starting.
I noticed that matthewmturner was working on something to run benchmarks in
docker, which is pretty nice! [3]
Any suggestions for performance use cases would be welcome; I could add
them in.
One thing I like to do is to run the same benchmark and tweak the knobs,
such as number of rows, cardinality, etc. because the effects can vary A
LOT.
I am tempted to venture opinions on how to do things based on my experience
building my own (closed-source) columnar query engine, but that one is an
entirely different beast, so I am not qualified to opine until I learn more.
I'm starting to follow history about various performance improvements, but
if anyone has any suggestion, like "I wish datafusion could complete X
query on 50 bazillion rows in less than 3 days", let me know. In
performance, there are so many variables that it's hard to know where to
start.
Thanks, Bob
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/tree/master/benchmarks
> [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1791
>
> [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1928
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 4:56 PM Bob Tinsman <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I just missed the call, but I watched the recording (thank you to Andrew
> > for posting [1]). Really interesting!
> > I'm diving into Arrow because I have some previous experience with
> > in-memory query engines. I'm following discussions around improving
> > performance and adding features so I can determine how best to
> contribute.
> >
> > In particular, I was interested in some of the background for the JIT
> > implementation [2] and the row format [3] but I guess I'm missing
> context.
> > I saw the comment in #1708 [4] that "many pipeline-breaking operators are
> > inherently row-based".
> > My questions:
> > - By "pipeline-breaking" I assume you mean "very slow", but can you give
> me
> > details? Does this arise from some particular observation, or other
> > reported issues?
> > - An example would be nice, like "select a, b, c from blah order by d"
> > with table "blah" having 1 million rows and 10 columns takes 5 minutes,
> or
> > even anecdotal evidence like mailing list discussions
> > - In general, what tools are you using to analyze datafusion performance?
> > - The criterion benchmarks are nice but do you have anything
> higher-level
> > which exercises a broad range of workloads?
> > - How much profiling have you done to identify bottlenecks?
> >
> > To be honest, I was kind of surprised to see using a row format to solve
> a
> > performance problem, but I figured you must have good reasons, and I'm
> > still getting my brain around datafusion's query execution model. Thanks
> > for any illumination!
> >
> > [1] https://youtu.be/5NJcqXm6uE0
> > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1849
> > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1782
> > [4] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1708
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 12:25 PM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I am not sure if everyone saw it in the agenda[1], but we plan to have
> a
> > > meeting tomorrow. I'll plan to record it for anyone who can not make
> this
> > > time.
> > >
> > > 15:00 UTC Wednesday March 9, 2022
> > > Meeting Location: (in agenda)
> > > Matthew Turner: focused on JIT and row representation, next Wednesday,
> > > March 9th,
> > > @yijie: JIT overview
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 12:50 AM Benson Muite <
> benson_muite@emailplus.org
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Interested in learning more about this. Can work through the code and
> > > > discuss on 17 March either 4:00 or 16:00 UTC.
> > > >
> > > > Benson
> > > >
> > > > On 3/3/22 12:03 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > > > I noticed that Matthew Turner added a note to the agenda[1] for a
> > walk
> > > > > through of the JIT code. I would be interested in this as well --
> > would
> > > > > anyone plan to be on the call and discuss it?
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't think I have time to prepare that content prior
> > > > >
> > > > > Andrew
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
[DISCUSS][Rust] Performance Measurements (was Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?)
Posted by Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>.
Hi Bob,
> - By "pipeline-breaking" I assume you mean "very slow", but can you give
me
details? Does this arise from some particular observation, or other
reported issues?
In general pipeline breaking means that the output of the operator can't be
produced until it has seen *ALL* its input.
For example, a sort (ORDER BY x) is a pipeline breaker because the engine
has to see the entire input prior to being able to produce any output.
However, a filter (WHERE x > 500) is not a pipeline breaker because the
operator can produce output rows as soon as it sees any that pass the
filter criteria.
> - In general, what tools are you using to analyze datafusion performance?
The tools used most commonly are in the benchmark directory [1] There is
some other work
> - How much profiling have you done to identify bottlenecks?
I would say it is done on an "as needed basis" -- namely someone runs a
query that is important to them and then improves whatever hotspot they may
find.
However, we don't have regular runs of the same queries or automatically
gather data over time. dianaclarke added integration for condabench in [2]
that I think would allow for such data collection, but no one has hooked up
the benchmarks to it uet.
Getting regular runs of the performance benchmark up and running would be
very valuable indeed, if you were looking to help.
Andrew
[1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/tree/master/benchmarks
[2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1791
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 4:56 PM Bob Tinsman <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just missed the call, but I watched the recording (thank you to Andrew
> for posting [1]). Really interesting!
> I'm diving into Arrow because I have some previous experience with
> in-memory query engines. I'm following discussions around improving
> performance and adding features so I can determine how best to contribute.
>
> In particular, I was interested in some of the background for the JIT
> implementation [2] and the row format [3] but I guess I'm missing context.
> I saw the comment in #1708 [4] that "many pipeline-breaking operators are
> inherently row-based".
> My questions:
> - By "pipeline-breaking" I assume you mean "very slow", but can you give me
> details? Does this arise from some particular observation, or other
> reported issues?
> - An example would be nice, like "select a, b, c from blah order by d"
> with table "blah" having 1 million rows and 10 columns takes 5 minutes, or
> even anecdotal evidence like mailing list discussions
> - In general, what tools are you using to analyze datafusion performance?
> - The criterion benchmarks are nice but do you have anything higher-level
> which exercises a broad range of workloads?
> - How much profiling have you done to identify bottlenecks?
>
> To be honest, I was kind of surprised to see using a row format to solve a
> performance problem, but I figured you must have good reasons, and I'm
> still getting my brain around datafusion's query execution model. Thanks
> for any illumination!
>
> [1] https://youtu.be/5NJcqXm6uE0
> [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1849
> [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1782
> [4] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1708
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 12:25 PM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
>
> > I am not sure if everyone saw it in the agenda[1], but we plan to have a
> > meeting tomorrow. I'll plan to record it for anyone who can not make this
> > time.
> >
> > 15:00 UTC Wednesday March 9, 2022
> > Meeting Location: (in agenda)
> > Matthew Turner: focused on JIT and row representation, next Wednesday,
> > March 9th,
> > @yijie: JIT overview
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 12:50 AM Benson Muite <benson_muite@emailplus.org
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Interested in learning more about this. Can work through the code and
> > > discuss on 17 March either 4:00 or 16:00 UTC.
> > >
> > > Benson
> > >
> > > On 3/3/22 12:03 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > > I noticed that Matthew Turner added a note to the agenda[1] for a
> walk
> > > > through of the JIT code. I would be interested in this as well --
> would
> > > > anyone plan to be on the call and discuss it?
> > > >
> > > > I don't think I have time to prepare that content prior
> > > >
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Posted by Bob Tinsman <bo...@gmail.com>.
I just missed the call, but I watched the recording (thank you to Andrew
for posting [1]). Really interesting!
I'm diving into Arrow because I have some previous experience with
in-memory query engines. I'm following discussions around improving
performance and adding features so I can determine how best to contribute.
In particular, I was interested in some of the background for the JIT
implementation [2] and the row format [3] but I guess I'm missing context.
I saw the comment in #1708 [4] that "many pipeline-breaking operators are
inherently row-based".
My questions:
- By "pipeline-breaking" I assume you mean "very slow", but can you give me
details? Does this arise from some particular observation, or other
reported issues?
- An example would be nice, like "select a, b, c from blah order by d"
with table "blah" having 1 million rows and 10 columns takes 5 minutes, or
even anecdotal evidence like mailing list discussions
- In general, what tools are you using to analyze datafusion performance?
- The criterion benchmarks are nice but do you have anything higher-level
which exercises a broad range of workloads?
- How much profiling have you done to identify bottlenecks?
To be honest, I was kind of surprised to see using a row format to solve a
performance problem, but I figured you must have good reasons, and I'm
still getting my brain around datafusion's query execution model. Thanks
for any illumination!
[1] https://youtu.be/5NJcqXm6uE0
[2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1849
[3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1782
[4] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1708
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 12:25 PM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
> I am not sure if everyone saw it in the agenda[1], but we plan to have a
> meeting tomorrow. I'll plan to record it for anyone who can not make this
> time.
>
> 15:00 UTC Wednesday March 9, 2022
> Meeting Location: (in agenda)
> Matthew Turner: focused on JIT and row representation, next Wednesday,
> March 9th,
> @yijie: JIT overview
>
> [1]
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 12:50 AM Benson Muite <be...@emailplus.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Interested in learning more about this. Can work through the code and
> > discuss on 17 March either 4:00 or 16:00 UTC.
> >
> > Benson
> >
> > On 3/3/22 12:03 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > I noticed that Matthew Turner added a note to the agenda[1] for a walk
> > > through of the JIT code. I would be interested in this as well -- would
> > > anyone plan to be on the call and discuss it?
> > >
> > > I don't think I have time to prepare that content prior
> > >
> > > Andrew
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Posted by Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>.
I am not sure if everyone saw it in the agenda[1], but we plan to have a
meeting tomorrow. I'll plan to record it for anyone who can not make this
time.
15:00 UTC Wednesday March 9, 2022
Meeting Location: (in agenda)
Matthew Turner: focused on JIT and row representation, next Wednesday,
March 9th,
@yijie: JIT overview
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 12:50 AM Benson Muite <be...@emailplus.org>
wrote:
> Interested in learning more about this. Can work through the code and
> discuss on 17 March either 4:00 or 16:00 UTC.
>
> Benson
>
> On 3/3/22 12:03 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > I noticed that Matthew Turner added a note to the agenda[1] for a walk
> > through of the JIT code. I would be interested in this as well -- would
> > anyone plan to be on the call and discuss it?
> >
> > I don't think I have time to prepare that content prior
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Posted by Benson Muite <be...@emailplus.org>.
Interested in learning more about this. Can work through the code and
discuss on 17 March either 4:00 or 16:00 UTC.
Benson
On 3/3/22 12:03 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> I noticed that Matthew Turner added a note to the agenda[1] for a walk
> through of the JIT code. I would be interested in this as well -- would
> anyone plan to be on the call and discuss it?
>
> I don't think I have time to prepare that content prior
>
> Andrew
>
> [1]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Posted by Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>.
I noticed that Matthew Turner added a note to the agenda[1] for a walk
through of the JIT code. I would be interested in this as well -- would
anyone plan to be on the call and discuss it?
I don't think I have time to prepare that content prior
Andrew
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 6:09 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
> I don't see any discussion items for today, so I won't plan on any call
> today. If anyone still wants to have a call please let me know
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 4:23 PM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't see any items on the agenda[1] for tomorrow's sync at 16:00 UTC;
>> Please add items if there is anything you would like to discuss.
>>
>> If there are no agenda items, we'll cancel the call and continue
>> asynchronously as always
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>> [1]
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 11:28 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Minutes from the call today. Recording can also be found in agenda[2]
>>>
>>> Attendees: Andrew Lamb, Rich, Paddy Horan
>>>
>>> Discussed proposal for more frequent releases [1]
>>>
>>> Discussed arrow / arrow2
>>>
>>> Decided to postpone multi-threaded execution walk through until someone
>>> with specific questions was on the call to guide where it went
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/1120
>>> [2]
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 11:48 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As a reminder, we plan to hold a Rust sync up tomorrow Thursday
>>>> December 22 at 16:00 UTC
>>>>
>>>> The zoom link and agenda are at [1] for anyone who wants to attend
>>>>
>>>> Andrew
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 6:43 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Benson, sorry for the confusion, I intend to meet at 16:00 UTC
>>>>> (e.g. 11:00 AM EST) in about 4 hours time from now; I have updated the
>>>>> agenda accordingly
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:47 PM Benson Muite <
>>>>> benson_muite@emailplus.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The slides are very helpful. Is the timing correct, 4 UTC?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/9/21 12:16 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
>>>>>> > I plan to do the biweekly call tomorrow
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > We are experimenting a bit with the agenda[1] for this one.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > After discussing any other agenda items people want, I plan to do a
>>>>>> code
>>>>>> > walkthrough with Matthew Turner and we'll discuss various parts of
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> > DataFusion and Arrow codebases and see where the conversation goes
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Andrew
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > [1]
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Posted by Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>.
I don't see any discussion items for today, so I won't plan on any call
today. If anyone still wants to have a call please let me know
Andrew
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 4:23 PM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
> I don't see any items on the agenda[1] for tomorrow's sync at 16:00 UTC;
> Please add items if there is anything you would like to discuss.
>
> If there are no agenda items, we'll cancel the call and continue
> asynchronously as always
>
> Andrew
>
> [1]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 11:28 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
>
>> Minutes from the call today. Recording can also be found in agenda[2]
>>
>> Attendees: Andrew Lamb, Rich, Paddy Horan
>>
>> Discussed proposal for more frequent releases [1]
>>
>> Discussed arrow / arrow2
>>
>> Decided to postpone multi-threaded execution walk through until someone
>> with specific questions was on the call to guide where it went
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/1120
>> [2]
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 11:48 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> As a reminder, we plan to hold a Rust sync up tomorrow Thursday December
>>> 22 at 16:00 UTC
>>>
>>> The zoom link and agenda are at [1] for anyone who wants to attend
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 6:43 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Benson, sorry for the confusion, I intend to meet at 16:00 UTC (e.g.
>>>> 11:00 AM EST) in about 4 hours time from now; I have updated the
>>>> agenda accordingly
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:47 PM Benson Muite <
>>>> benson_muite@emailplus.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The slides are very helpful. Is the timing correct, 4 UTC?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/9/21 12:16 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
>>>>> > I plan to do the biweekly call tomorrow
>>>>> >
>>>>> > We are experimenting a bit with the agenda[1] for this one.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > After discussing any other agenda items people want, I plan to do a
>>>>> code
>>>>> > walkthrough with Matthew Turner and we'll discuss various parts of
>>>>> the
>>>>> > DataFusion and Arrow codebases and see where the conversation goes
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Andrew
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > [1]
>>>>> >
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Posted by Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>.
I don't see any items on the agenda[1] for tomorrow's sync at 16:00 UTC;
Please add items if there is anything you would like to discuss.
If there are no agenda items, we'll cancel the call and continue
asynchronously as always
Andrew
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 11:28 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
> Minutes from the call today. Recording can also be found in agenda[2]
>
> Attendees: Andrew Lamb, Rich, Paddy Horan
>
> Discussed proposal for more frequent releases [1]
>
> Discussed arrow / arrow2
>
> Decided to postpone multi-threaded execution walk through until someone
> with specific questions was on the call to guide where it went
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/1120
> [2]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 11:48 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
>
>> As a reminder, we plan to hold a Rust sync up tomorrow Thursday December
>> 22 at 16:00 UTC
>>
>> The zoom link and agenda are at [1] for anyone who wants to attend
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>> [1]
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 6:43 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Benson, sorry for the confusion, I intend to meet at 16:00 UTC (e.g.
>>> 11:00 AM EST) in about 4 hours time from now; I have updated the
>>> agenda accordingly
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:47 PM Benson Muite <be...@emailplus.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The slides are very helpful. Is the timing correct, 4 UTC?
>>>>
>>>> On 12/9/21 12:16 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
>>>> > I plan to do the biweekly call tomorrow
>>>> >
>>>> > We are experimenting a bit with the agenda[1] for this one.
>>>> >
>>>> > After discussing any other agenda items people want, I plan to do a
>>>> code
>>>> > walkthrough with Matthew Turner and we'll discuss various parts of the
>>>> > DataFusion and Arrow codebases and see where the conversation goes
>>>> >
>>>> > Andrew
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > [1]
>>>> >
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Posted by Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>.
Minutes from the call today. Recording can also be found in agenda[2]
Attendees: Andrew Lamb, Rich, Paddy Horan
Discussed proposal for more frequent releases [1]
Discussed arrow / arrow2
Decided to postpone multi-threaded execution walk through until someone
with specific questions was on the call to guide where it went
[1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/1120
[2]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 11:48 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
> As a reminder, we plan to hold a Rust sync up tomorrow Thursday December
> 22 at 16:00 UTC
>
> The zoom link and agenda are at [1] for anyone who wants to attend
>
> Andrew
>
> [1]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 6:43 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Benson, sorry for the confusion, I intend to meet at 16:00 UTC (e.g.
>> 11:00 AM EST) in about 4 hours time from now; I have updated the
>> agenda accordingly
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:47 PM Benson Muite <be...@emailplus.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The slides are very helpful. Is the timing correct, 4 UTC?
>>>
>>> On 12/9/21 12:16 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
>>> > I plan to do the biweekly call tomorrow
>>> >
>>> > We are experimenting a bit with the agenda[1] for this one.
>>> >
>>> > After discussing any other agenda items people want, I plan to do a
>>> code
>>> > walkthrough with Matthew Turner and we'll discuss various parts of the
>>> > DataFusion and Arrow codebases and see where the conversation goes
>>> >
>>> > Andrew
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > [1]
>>> >
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Posted by Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>.
As a reminder, we plan to hold a Rust sync up tomorrow Thursday December 22
at 16:00 UTC
The zoom link and agenda are at [1] for anyone who wants to attend
Andrew
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 6:43 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
> Hi Benson, sorry for the confusion, I intend to meet at 16:00 UTC (e.g.
> 11:00 AM EST) in about 4 hours time from now; I have updated the
> agenda accordingly
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:47 PM Benson Muite <be...@emailplus.org>
> wrote:
>
>> The slides are very helpful. Is the timing correct, 4 UTC?
>>
>> On 12/9/21 12:16 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
>> > I plan to do the biweekly call tomorrow
>> >
>> > We are experimenting a bit with the agenda[1] for this one.
>> >
>> > After discussing any other agenda items people want, I plan to do a code
>> > walkthrough with Matthew Turner and we'll discuss various parts of the
>> > DataFusion and Arrow codebases and see where the conversation goes
>> >
>> > Andrew
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
>> >
>> >
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Posted by Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>.
Hi Benson, sorry for the confusion, I intend to meet at 16:00 UTC (e.g.
11:00 AM EST) in about 4 hours time from now; I have updated the
agenda accordingly
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:47 PM Benson Muite <be...@emailplus.org>
wrote:
> The slides are very helpful. Is the timing correct, 4 UTC?
>
> On 12/9/21 12:16 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > I plan to do the biweekly call tomorrow
> >
> > We are experimenting a bit with the agenda[1] for this one.
> >
> > After discussing any other agenda items people want, I plan to do a code
> > walkthrough with Matthew Turner and we'll discuss various parts of the
> > DataFusion and Arrow codebases and see where the conversation goes
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> >
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
> >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Posted by Benson Muite <be...@emailplus.org>.
The slides are very helpful. Is the timing correct, 4 UTC?
On 12/9/21 12:16 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> I plan to do the biweekly call tomorrow
>
> We are experimenting a bit with the agenda[1] for this one.
>
> After discussing any other agenda items people want, I plan to do a code
> walkthrough with Matthew Turner and we'll discuss various parts of the
> DataFusion and Arrow codebases and see where the conversation goes
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
> [1]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Posted by Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>.
I plan to do the biweekly call tomorrow
We are experimenting a bit with the agenda[1] for this one.
After discussing any other agenda items people want, I plan to do a code
walkthrough with Matthew Turner and we'll discuss various parts of the
DataFusion and Arrow codebases and see where the conversation goes
Andrew
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 11:36 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
> Due to lack of agenda items [1] this week , I do not plan on holding the
> call
>
> [1]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 1:57 PM Benson Muite <be...@emailplus.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Cannot host at 4:00 UTC on 28 October, but can host at 4:00 UTC on 11
>> November.
>>
>> Benson
>>
>> On 10/27/21 1:02 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
>> > We have some proposed agenda items[1] for the Rust sync[1] this week so
>> I
>> > will plan to see anyone who is interested tomorrow.
>> >
>> > Andrew
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
>> > [2]
>> >
>> https://arrow.apache.org/datafusion/community/communication.html#sync-up-zoom-calls
>> >
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Posted by Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>.
Due to lack of agenda items [1] this week , I do not plan on holding the
call
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 1:57 PM Benson Muite <be...@emailplus.org>
wrote:
> Cannot host at 4:00 UTC on 28 October, but can host at 4:00 UTC on 11
> November.
>
> Benson
>
> On 10/27/21 1:02 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > We have some proposed agenda items[1] for the Rust sync[1] this week so I
> > will plan to see anyone who is interested tomorrow.
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
> > [2]
> >
> https://arrow.apache.org/datafusion/community/communication.html#sync-up-zoom-calls
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Posted by Benson Muite <be...@emailplus.org>.
Cannot host at 4:00 UTC on 28 October, but can host at 4:00 UTC on 11
November.
Benson
On 10/27/21 1:02 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> We have some proposed agenda items[1] for the Rust sync[1] this week so I
> will plan to see anyone who is interested tomorrow.
>
> Andrew
>
> [1]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
> [2]
> https://arrow.apache.org/datafusion/community/communication.html#sync-up-zoom-calls
>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Posted by Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>.
We have some proposed agenda items[1] for the Rust sync[1] this week so I
will plan to see anyone who is interested tomorrow.
Andrew
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
[2]
https://arrow.apache.org/datafusion/community/communication.html#sync-up-zoom-calls
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:59 AM QP Hou <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Anyone is welcome to join the party.
>
> --QP
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 7:02 AM Ben Chen <be...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm new to Arrow. Is such a call specific to a small group of people or
> > welcome to anyone?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ben
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 9:17 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I agree -- since no one has added anything to the agenda, I will
> cancel it
> > > (and leave a note in the agenda document to that effect)
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 1:23 AM QP Hou <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I recommend skipping the meeting if there is no proposed item before
> > > > the meeting starts. Changing to monthly cadence also sounds like a
> > > > good idea. We can always change it back to bi-weekly or call of
> ad-hoc
> > > > meetings if there are more items that need to be discussed.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:43 PM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Tomorrow October 14 would be the next 16:00 Rust sync up.
> > > > >
> > > > > However, we don't seem to have anything on the agenda[1]
> > > > >
> > > > > Would anyone like to propose topics? Or shall we skip this time ?
> Maybe
> > > > > monthly would be a better cadence?
> > > > >
> > > > > Andrew
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:46 PM Jiayu Liu <ji...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks Andrew for facilitating this meeting and very happy to
> "meet"
> > > > > > everyone on the call. Hope you have a great day / evening.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:38 AM Andrew Lamb <
> alamb@influxdata.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Notes from the 16:00 UTC Call:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Attendees:
> > > > > > > Andrew Lamb
> > > > > > > Shen Yi Jie
> > > > > > > Matt Turner
> > > > > > > Zied BF
> > > > > > > Remi Dettai
> > > > > > > Rich
> > > > > > > Ruihang
> > > > > > > Jaiyu Liu
> > > > > > > QP
> > > > > > > Jorn Horstmann
> > > > > > > Benson Muite
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Introductions (20 minutes)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Discussion Items (10 minutes):
> > > > > > > * Interest in python binding, though it is lagging behind
> > > > > > > * Thoughts on boundaries between Arrow, DataFusion and Ballista
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:29 AM Benson Muite <
> > > > > > benson_muite@emailplus.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Attendees:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ruihang
> > > > > > > > Benson
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Discussion items:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Self-introduction
> > > > > > > > OpenVidu seemed to work
> > > > > > > > Data Fusion introduction
> > > > > > > > Speed of Arrow development process and intended use cases
> > > > > > > > Maybe get time zones of attendees?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 9/30/21 6:58 AM, Benson Muite wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Join link:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://mkutano.nairuby.org/#/soft-amaranth-alpaca
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Sorry it is late. Meeting should be short, as it seems
> there
> > > is a
> > > > > > > > > preference for one meeting.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 9/29/21 10:59 AM, Benson Muite wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> Hi,
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at
> 3:45
> > > > UTC
> > > > > > > > >> tomorrow.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Update the google doc [1]
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Would be helpful to know if having 2 meetings on the same
> day,
> > > > or
> > > > > > > > >> alternating the meeting time will work best for most
> people.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > > > > >> Benson
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> [1]
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> On 9/24/21 4:26 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>> Thank you!
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite
> > > > > > > > >>> <be...@emailplus.org>
> > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video
> > > > > > conferencing
> > > > > > > > >>>> solution that should just work in the browser.
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> Benson
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>>> The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not
> > > > typically
> > > > > > > > >>>>> available
> > > > > > > > >>>> at
> > > > > > > > >>>>> 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could
> please
> > > > > > arrange
> > > > > > > > >>>>> that.
> > > > > > > > >>>>> Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and
> we can
> > > > > > adjust
> > > > > > > > >>>>> schedules or technology as needed:
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting
> > > > September
> > > > > > > > >>>>> 30, 2021
> > > > > > > > >>>>> Location: Zoom [2]
> > > > > > > > >>>>> Agenda: Google docs [1]
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> We will send a summary of all sync ups to the mailing
> > > list. I
> > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > >>>>> also
> > > > > > > > >>>>> proposed adding this information to the website [3]
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > >>>>> Andrew
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> [1]
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> [2]
> > > > > > > > >>>>> Topic: Apache Arrow Rust Syncup (arrow, datafusion
> > > ballista,
> > > > etc)
> > > > > > > > >>>>> Time:
> > > > > > > > >>>> Sep
> > > > > > > > >>>>> 30, 2021 04:00 PM Universal Time UTC
> > > > > > > > >>>>> https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>> [3]
> > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1042/files
> > > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Posted by QP Hou <ho...@gmail.com>.
Hi Ben,
Anyone is welcome to join the party.
--QP
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 7:02 AM Ben Chen <be...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to Arrow. Is such a call specific to a small group of people or
> welcome to anyone?
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 9:17 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
>
> > I agree -- since no one has added anything to the agenda, I will cancel it
> > (and leave a note in the agenda document to that effect)
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 1:23 AM QP Hou <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I recommend skipping the meeting if there is no proposed item before
> > > the meeting starts. Changing to monthly cadence also sounds like a
> > > good idea. We can always change it back to bi-weekly or call of ad-hoc
> > > meetings if there are more items that need to be discussed.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:43 PM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Tomorrow October 14 would be the next 16:00 Rust sync up.
> > > >
> > > > However, we don't seem to have anything on the agenda[1]
> > > >
> > > > Would anyone like to propose topics? Or shall we skip this time ? Maybe
> > > > monthly would be a better cadence?
> > > >
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:46 PM Jiayu Liu <ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks Andrew for facilitating this meeting and very happy to "meet"
> > > > > everyone on the call. Hope you have a great day / evening.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:38 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Notes from the 16:00 UTC Call:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Attendees:
> > > > > > Andrew Lamb
> > > > > > Shen Yi Jie
> > > > > > Matt Turner
> > > > > > Zied BF
> > > > > > Remi Dettai
> > > > > > Rich
> > > > > > Ruihang
> > > > > > Jaiyu Liu
> > > > > > QP
> > > > > > Jorn Horstmann
> > > > > > Benson Muite
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Introductions (20 minutes)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Discussion Items (10 minutes):
> > > > > > * Interest in python binding, though it is lagging behind
> > > > > > * Thoughts on boundaries between Arrow, DataFusion and Ballista
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:29 AM Benson Muite <
> > > > > benson_muite@emailplus.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Attendees:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ruihang
> > > > > > > Benson
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Discussion items:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Self-introduction
> > > > > > > OpenVidu seemed to work
> > > > > > > Data Fusion introduction
> > > > > > > Speed of Arrow development process and intended use cases
> > > > > > > Maybe get time zones of attendees?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 9/30/21 6:58 AM, Benson Muite wrote:
> > > > > > > > Join link:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://mkutano.nairuby.org/#/soft-amaranth-alpaca
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Sorry it is late. Meeting should be short, as it seems there
> > is a
> > > > > > > > preference for one meeting.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 9/29/21 10:59 AM, Benson Muite wrote:
> > > > > > > >> Hi,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at 3:45
> > > UTC
> > > > > > > >> tomorrow.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Update the google doc [1]
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Would be helpful to know if having 2 meetings on the same day,
> > > or
> > > > > > > >> alternating the meeting time will work best for most people.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > > > >> Benson
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> [1]
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On 9/24/21 4:26 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > > > > > >>> Thank you!
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite
> > > > > > > >>> <be...@emailplus.org>
> > > > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video
> > > > > conferencing
> > > > > > > >>>> solution that should just work in the browser.
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> Benson
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>> The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not
> > > typically
> > > > > > > >>>>> available
> > > > > > > >>>> at
> > > > > > > >>>>> 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please
> > > > > arrange
> > > > > > > >>>>> that.
> > > > > > > >>>>> Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can
> > > > > adjust
> > > > > > > >>>>> schedules or technology as needed:
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting
> > > September
> > > > > > > >>>>> 30, 2021
> > > > > > > >>>>> Location: Zoom [2]
> > > > > > > >>>>> Agenda: Google docs [1]
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> We will send a summary of all sync ups to the mailing
> > list. I
> > > > > have
> > > > > > > >>>>> also
> > > > > > > >>>>> proposed adding this information to the website [3]
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > > >>>>> Andrew
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> [1]
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> [2]
> > > > > > > >>>>> Topic: Apache Arrow Rust Syncup (arrow, datafusion
> > ballista,
> > > etc)
> > > > > > > >>>>> Time:
> > > > > > > >>>> Sep
> > > > > > > >>>>> 30, 2021 04:00 PM Universal Time UTC
> > > > > > > >>>>> https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> [3]
> > > https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1042/files
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Posted by Ben Chen <be...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I'm new to Arrow. Is such a call specific to a small group of people or
welcome to anyone?
Thanks,
Ben
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 9:17 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
> I agree -- since no one has added anything to the agenda, I will cancel it
> (and leave a note in the agenda document to that effect)
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 1:23 AM QP Hou <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I recommend skipping the meeting if there is no proposed item before
> > the meeting starts. Changing to monthly cadence also sounds like a
> > good idea. We can always change it back to bi-weekly or call of ad-hoc
> > meetings if there are more items that need to be discussed.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:43 PM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Tomorrow October 14 would be the next 16:00 Rust sync up.
> > >
> > > However, we don't seem to have anything on the agenda[1]
> > >
> > > Would anyone like to propose topics? Or shall we skip this time ? Maybe
> > > monthly would be a better cadence?
> > >
> > > Andrew
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:46 PM Jiayu Liu <ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Andrew for facilitating this meeting and very happy to "meet"
> > > > everyone on the call. Hope you have a great day / evening.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:38 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Notes from the 16:00 UTC Call:
> > > > >
> > > > > Attendees:
> > > > > Andrew Lamb
> > > > > Shen Yi Jie
> > > > > Matt Turner
> > > > > Zied BF
> > > > > Remi Dettai
> > > > > Rich
> > > > > Ruihang
> > > > > Jaiyu Liu
> > > > > QP
> > > > > Jorn Horstmann
> > > > > Benson Muite
> > > > >
> > > > > Introductions (20 minutes)
> > > > >
> > > > > Discussion Items (10 minutes):
> > > > > * Interest in python binding, though it is lagging behind
> > > > > * Thoughts on boundaries between Arrow, DataFusion and Ballista
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:29 AM Benson Muite <
> > > > benson_muite@emailplus.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Attendees:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ruihang
> > > > > > Benson
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Discussion items:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Self-introduction
> > > > > > OpenVidu seemed to work
> > > > > > Data Fusion introduction
> > > > > > Speed of Arrow development process and intended use cases
> > > > > > Maybe get time zones of attendees?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 9/30/21 6:58 AM, Benson Muite wrote:
> > > > > > > Join link:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://mkutano.nairuby.org/#/soft-amaranth-alpaca
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sorry it is late. Meeting should be short, as it seems there
> is a
> > > > > > > preference for one meeting.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 9/29/21 10:59 AM, Benson Muite wrote:
> > > > > > >> Hi,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at 3:45
> > UTC
> > > > > > >> tomorrow.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Update the google doc [1]
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Would be helpful to know if having 2 meetings on the same day,
> > or
> > > > > > >> alternating the meeting time will work best for most people.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > > >> Benson
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> [1]
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On 9/24/21 4:26 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > > > > >>> Thank you!
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite
> > > > > > >>> <be...@emailplus.org>
> > > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video
> > > > conferencing
> > > > > > >>>> solution that should just work in the browser.
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Benson
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>> The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not
> > typically
> > > > > > >>>>> available
> > > > > > >>>> at
> > > > > > >>>>> 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please
> > > > arrange
> > > > > > >>>>> that.
> > > > > > >>>>> Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can
> > > > adjust
> > > > > > >>>>> schedules or technology as needed:
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting
> > September
> > > > > > >>>>> 30, 2021
> > > > > > >>>>> Location: Zoom [2]
> > > > > > >>>>> Agenda: Google docs [1]
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> We will send a summary of all sync ups to the mailing
> list. I
> > > > have
> > > > > > >>>>> also
> > > > > > >>>>> proposed adding this information to the website [3]
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > >>>>> Andrew
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> [1]
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> [2]
> > > > > > >>>>> Topic: Apache Arrow Rust Syncup (arrow, datafusion
> ballista,
> > etc)
> > > > > > >>>>> Time:
> > > > > > >>>> Sep
> > > > > > >>>>> 30, 2021 04:00 PM Universal Time UTC
> > > > > > >>>>> https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> [3]
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1042/files
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Posted by Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>.
I agree -- since no one has added anything to the agenda, I will cancel it
(and leave a note in the agenda document to that effect)
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 1:23 AM QP Hou <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I recommend skipping the meeting if there is no proposed item before
> the meeting starts. Changing to monthly cadence also sounds like a
> good idea. We can always change it back to bi-weekly or call of ad-hoc
> meetings if there are more items that need to be discussed.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:43 PM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
> >
> > Tomorrow October 14 would be the next 16:00 Rust sync up.
> >
> > However, we don't seem to have anything on the agenda[1]
> >
> > Would anyone like to propose topics? Or shall we skip this time ? Maybe
> > monthly would be a better cadence?
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:46 PM Jiayu Liu <ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Andrew for facilitating this meeting and very happy to "meet"
> > > everyone on the call. Hope you have a great day / evening.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:38 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Notes from the 16:00 UTC Call:
> > > >
> > > > Attendees:
> > > > Andrew Lamb
> > > > Shen Yi Jie
> > > > Matt Turner
> > > > Zied BF
> > > > Remi Dettai
> > > > Rich
> > > > Ruihang
> > > > Jaiyu Liu
> > > > QP
> > > > Jorn Horstmann
> > > > Benson Muite
> > > >
> > > > Introductions (20 minutes)
> > > >
> > > > Discussion Items (10 minutes):
> > > > * Interest in python binding, though it is lagging behind
> > > > * Thoughts on boundaries between Arrow, DataFusion and Ballista
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:29 AM Benson Muite <
> > > benson_muite@emailplus.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Attendees:
> > > > >
> > > > > Ruihang
> > > > > Benson
> > > > >
> > > > > Discussion items:
> > > > >
> > > > > Self-introduction
> > > > > OpenVidu seemed to work
> > > > > Data Fusion introduction
> > > > > Speed of Arrow development process and intended use cases
> > > > > Maybe get time zones of attendees?
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/30/21 6:58 AM, Benson Muite wrote:
> > > > > > Join link:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://mkutano.nairuby.org/#/soft-amaranth-alpaca
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sorry it is late. Meeting should be short, as it seems there is a
> > > > > > preference for one meeting.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 9/29/21 10:59 AM, Benson Muite wrote:
> > > > > >> Hi,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at 3:45
> UTC
> > > > > >> tomorrow.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Update the google doc [1]
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Would be helpful to know if having 2 meetings on the same day,
> or
> > > > > >> alternating the meeting time will work best for most people.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > >> Benson
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [1]
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On 9/24/21 4:26 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > > > >>> Thank you!
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite
> > > > > >>> <be...@emailplus.org>
> > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video
> > > conferencing
> > > > > >>>> solution that should just work in the browser.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Benson
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > > > >>>>> The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not
> typically
> > > > > >>>>> available
> > > > > >>>> at
> > > > > >>>>> 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please
> > > arrange
> > > > > >>>>> that.
> > > > > >>>>> Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can
> > > adjust
> > > > > >>>>> schedules or technology as needed:
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting
> September
> > > > > >>>>> 30, 2021
> > > > > >>>>> Location: Zoom [2]
> > > > > >>>>> Agenda: Google docs [1]
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> We will send a summary of all sync ups to the mailing list. I
> > > have
> > > > > >>>>> also
> > > > > >>>>> proposed adding this information to the website [3]
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > >>>>> Andrew
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> [1]
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> [2]
> > > > > >>>>> Topic: Apache Arrow Rust Syncup (arrow, datafusion ballista,
> etc)
> > > > > >>>>> Time:
> > > > > >>>> Sep
> > > > > >>>>> 30, 2021 04:00 PM Universal Time UTC
> > > > > >>>>> https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> [3]
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1042/files
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
Re: [DISCUSS][Rust] Biweekly sync call for arrow/datafusion again?
Posted by QP Hou <ho...@gmail.com>.
I recommend skipping the meeting if there is no proposed item before
the meeting starts. Changing to monthly cadence also sounds like a
good idea. We can always change it back to bi-weekly or call of ad-hoc
meetings if there are more items that need to be discussed.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:43 PM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
>
> Tomorrow October 14 would be the next 16:00 Rust sync up.
>
> However, we don't seem to have anything on the agenda[1]
>
> Would anyone like to propose topics? Or shall we skip this time ? Maybe
> monthly would be a better cadence?
>
> Andrew
>
>
> [1]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:46 PM Jiayu Liu <ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Andrew for facilitating this meeting and very happy to "meet"
> > everyone on the call. Hope you have a great day / evening.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:38 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Notes from the 16:00 UTC Call:
> > >
> > > Attendees:
> > > Andrew Lamb
> > > Shen Yi Jie
> > > Matt Turner
> > > Zied BF
> > > Remi Dettai
> > > Rich
> > > Ruihang
> > > Jaiyu Liu
> > > QP
> > > Jorn Horstmann
> > > Benson Muite
> > >
> > > Introductions (20 minutes)
> > >
> > > Discussion Items (10 minutes):
> > > * Interest in python binding, though it is lagging behind
> > > * Thoughts on boundaries between Arrow, DataFusion and Ballista
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:29 AM Benson Muite <
> > benson_muite@emailplus.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Attendees:
> > > >
> > > > Ruihang
> > > > Benson
> > > >
> > > > Discussion items:
> > > >
> > > > Self-introduction
> > > > OpenVidu seemed to work
> > > > Data Fusion introduction
> > > > Speed of Arrow development process and intended use cases
> > > > Maybe get time zones of attendees?
> > > >
> > > > On 9/30/21 6:58 AM, Benson Muite wrote:
> > > > > Join link:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://mkutano.nairuby.org/#/soft-amaranth-alpaca
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry it is late. Meeting should be short, as it seems there is a
> > > > > preference for one meeting.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/29/21 10:59 AM, Benson Muite wrote:
> > > > >> Hi,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at 3:45 UTC
> > > > >> tomorrow.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Update the google doc [1]
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Would be helpful to know if having 2 meetings on the same day, or
> > > > >> alternating the meeting time will work best for most people.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Regards,
> > > > >> Benson
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1]
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 9/24/21 4:26 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > > >>> Thank you!
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite
> > > > >>> <be...@emailplus.org>
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video
> > conferencing
> > > > >>>> solution that should just work in the browser.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Benson
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > > >>>>> The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not typically
> > > > >>>>> available
> > > > >>>> at
> > > > >>>>> 4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please
> > arrange
> > > > >>>>> that.
> > > > >>>>> Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can
> > adjust
> > > > >>>>> schedules or technology as needed:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC starting September
> > > > >>>>> 30, 2021
> > > > >>>>> Location: Zoom [2]
> > > > >>>>> Agenda: Google docs [1]
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> We will send a summary of all sync ups to the mailing list. I
> > have
> > > > >>>>> also
> > > > >>>>> proposed adding this information to the website [3]
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>>> Andrew
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> [1]
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > >
> > >
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> [2]
> > > > >>>>> Topic: Apache Arrow Rust Syncup (arrow, datafusion ballista, etc)
> > > > >>>>> Time:
> > > > >>>> Sep
> > > > >>>>> 30, 2021 04:00 PM Universal Time UTC
> > > > >>>>> https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/1042/files
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >