You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by "Eduardo Breijo (JIRA)" <de...@myfaces.apache.org> on 2018/01/04 19:45:04 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (MYFACES-4183) Behavior difference between JSF 2.2
and JSF 2.3 when using facelet prefixes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Eduardo Breijo updated MYFACES-4183:
------------------------------------
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Behavior difference between JSF 2.2 and JSF 2.3 when using facelet prefixes
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MYFACES-4183
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4183
> Project: MyFaces Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JSR-372
> Affects Versions: 2.3.0-beta
> Reporter: Eduardo Breijo
> Assignee: Eduardo Breijo
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: JSF20FacesConfigAnotherServlet.war, MYFACES-4183.patch
>
>
> There is a difference in behavior between JSF 2.2 and JSF 2.3 when using facelet prefixes.
> I have a sample app that demonstrate this behavior difference. In the app we just define a random servlet and map it to the same prefixes we would normally map to the FacesServlet. We don't map /faces/* to the testServlet but it is automatically added to the FacesServlet, so if you drove a request to something other than .jsf (testServlet) or *.faces (testServlet) the FacesServlet would be invoked for all of the prefix mappings of /faces/*. So that would mean you should see TEST SERVLET printed for the suffix mapping (.jsf and .faces) and then the page1 should be rendered for /faces/*.
> When you drive a request to: http://localhost:8080/JSF20FacesConfigAnotherServlet/faces/page1.jsf
> On JSF 2.2: You should see an output of "TEST SERVLET". So it ensures that .jsf mapping is invoking the testServlet.
> On JSF 2.3: You get a 404, page1.jsf not found. I think that in the case of JSF 2.3, it is invoking the FacesServlet but can't find the .jsf file because it doesn't actually exist.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)