You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@wicket.apache.org by "Martin Grigorov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/05/27 20:20:22 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (WICKET-5184) Change signature of AbstractTree
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13667893#comment-13667893 ]
Martin Grigorov commented on WICKET-5184:
-----------------------------------------
Here is a clean solution to solve the problem in the application code:
Set<Foo> set = new HashSet<>();
add(new DefaultNestedTree<Foo>("tree", new FooProvider(), new SetModel<>(set))
I'm not sure why Model.ofXyz() methods require "? extends C".
> Change signature of AbstractTree
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: WICKET-5184
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5184
> Project: Wicket
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: wicket-extensions
> Affects Versions: 6.7.0
> Reporter: Ilia Naryzhny
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 7.0.0
>
>
> There is following problem in wicket 6 with trees:
> Constructor of class org.apache.wicket.extensions.markup.html.repeater.tree.AbstractTree have following signature:
> protected AbstractTree(String id, ITreeProvider<T> provider, IModel<Set<T>> state)
> The problem is in "IModel<Set<T>> state" argument and fact that Model.ofSet return IModel<Set<? extends C>>, so it's not possible directly pass IModel<Set<? extends C>> to constructor. It seems that either Model.ofSet should be changed or AbstractTree.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira