[2/2] git commit: removing an errant reference to Forrest

[ke...@apache.org]

removing an errant reference to Forrest


Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-cloudstack/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-cloudstack/commit/0131f964
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-cloudstack/tree/0131f964
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-cloudstack/diff/0131f964

Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: 0131f964ff4509b28e92fb3cd4efddd393a73c94
Parents: 4cfbe5c
Author: David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>
Authored: Mon Jun 4 22:24:01 2012 -0400
Committer: David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>
Committed: Mon Jun 4 22:24:01 2012 -0400

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 project_admin/process/committerVote.txt |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------


http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-cloudstack/blob/0131f964/project_admin/process/committerVote.txt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/project_admin/process/committerVote.txt b/project_admin/process/committerVote.txt
index 859195e..6cdc330 100644
--- a/project_admin/process/committerVote.txt
+++ b/project_admin/process/committerVote.txt
@@ -92,5 +92,5 @@ they respond to criticism. By how they participate in decision-making process.
 2) Committment - How do we evaluate?  By time, by sticking through tough
 issues, by helping on not-so-fun tasks as well.
 3) Personal skill/ability - How do we evaluate?  A solid general understanding
-of Forrest.  Quality of discussion in mail.  Patches easy to apply with only
+of CloudStack.  Quality of discussion in mail.  Patches easy to apply with only
 a cursory review.