[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2889) Remove @lucene.experimental from Numeric*

["Simon Willnauer (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12986882#action_12986882 ] 

Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2889:
-----------------------------------------

+1 - go for it uwe

> Remove @lucene.experimental from Numeric*
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2889
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2889
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Analysis, Search
>            Reporter: Uwe Schindler
>            Assignee: Uwe Schindler
>             Fix For: 3.1, 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2889.patch
>
>
> NumericRangeQuery and NumericField are now there since 2.9. It is still marked as experimental. The API stabilized and there are no changes in the public parts (even in Lucene trunk no changes). Also lot's of people ask, if "experimental" means "unstable" in general, but it means only "unstable API".
> I will remove the @lucene.experimental from Numeric* classes. NumericUtils* stays with @lucene.internal, as it is not intended for public use. Some people use it to make "TermQuery" on a numeric field, but this should be done using a NRQ with upper==lower and included=true, which does not affect scoring (applies also to Solr).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org