[jira] [Resolved] (HAWQ-327) Clover License Violation

["Goden Yao (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Goden Yao resolved HAWQ-327.
----------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed
      Assignee: Lei Chang  (was: Jiali Yao)

> Clover License Violation
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: HAWQ-327
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-327
>             Project: Apache HAWQ
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Build, Tests
>            Reporter: Goden Yao
>            Assignee: Lei Chang
>              Labels: CodeCoverage
>             Fix For: 2.0.0-beta-incubating
>
>
>    ./contrib/hawq-hadoop/lib/clover.license
> Thanks to [~cwelton]'s investigation:
> {quote}
> This looks like it is the code coverage tool that was used for the
> hawq-hadoop contrib module, the license file is referenced by all the pom
> files under contrib/hawq-hadoop and I expect it would break at least the
> code coverage tests if it was removed.
> ./hawq-mapreduce-ao/pom.xml:
>  <licenseLocation>../lib/clover.license</licenseLocation>
> ./hawq-mapreduce-common/pom.xml:
>  <licenseLocation>../lib/clover.license</licenseLocation>
> ./hawq-mapreduce-parquet/pom.xml:
>  <licenseLocation>../lib/clover.license</licenseLocation>
> ./hawq-mapreduce-tool/pom.xml:
>  <licenseLocation>../lib/clover.license</licenseLocation>
> ./pom.xml: <licenseLocation>lib/clover.license</licenseLocation>
> That said... I strongly doubt that it is kosher to place a license file
> that almost certainly was not a worldwide license into the OSS. This should
> be removed and Pivotal should contact Atlassian about the unintentional
> license leak.
> For reference this[1] looks like the correct identity resolution for this
> particular 'clover'.
> [1] https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/CLOVER/About+Clover
> {quote}
> We want to make sure:
> * remove clover license file and reference to it.
> * build can still pass
> * if we provide code coverage test during make, it needs to have some alternative after getting ride of the tool.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)