Connector 1.6 support

[Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>]

Hi All,

I've been working on providing support for connector 1.6 modules. I've just
committed a patch which moves us onto the latest geronimo connector, and
also scrapes the new connector annotations and merges them into the JAXB
tree. Most of the changes are in AnnotationDeployer, with a few tweaks where
the Geronimo connector API has changed slightly. I'm pretty new to the
connector stuff, so I've followed the examples in the connector tests to
work out what I need to pass in. Hopefully its doing the right thing.

There's still some validation stuff I want to add in to AnnotationDeployer,
and I want to expand on the tests as well. It seems to work for the tests
I've tried. If anyone has any feedback it would be gratefully received!

Thanks

Jon

Re: Connector 1.6 support

[David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>]

You might take a look at my refactoring of the geronimo connector stuff in

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/djencks/txmanager

I haven't had a chance to work on it much lately but I think it includes a bunch of deployment related stuff in a fairly portable form.  I'm hoping to move the connector support in this direction.  A lot of the changes are to make it more osgi friendly, but AFAIK this does not restrict its use outside osgi.

thanks
david jencks

On Jun 10, 2011, at 4:35 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> I've been working on providing support for connector 1.6 modules. I've just
> committed a patch which moves us onto the latest geronimo connector, and
> also scrapes the new connector annotations and merges them into the JAXB
> tree. Most of the changes are in AnnotationDeployer, with a few tweaks where
> the Geronimo connector API has changed slightly. I'm pretty new to the
> connector stuff, so I've followed the examples in the connector tests to
> work out what I need to pass in. Hopefully its doing the right thing.
> 
> There's still some validation stuff I want to add in to AnnotationDeployer,
> and I want to expand on the tests as well. It seems to work for the tests
> I've tried. If anyone has any feedback it would be gratefully received!
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Jon