You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org> on 2011/05/08 19:17:47 UTC
Status of
Hi,
Recently I was updating the Wiki page for Wicket XML tags and
attributes and I added wicket:component tag section.
Now discussing the new .xsd with Attila I remembered some discussions
from ~ 2 years ago about this component resolver being with status
experimental and probably being dropped.
What is the current state of it? Will we support it or deprecate it ?
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com
Re: Status of
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
OK, I'll create a ticket and if anyone else don't raise voice the next
two days I'll nuke it.
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> if its not yet, all traces of it should be removed.
>
> -igor
>
> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Recently I was updating the Wiki page for Wicket XML tags and
>> attributes and I added wicket:component tag section.
>> Now discussing the new .xsd with Attila I remembered some discussions
>> from ~ 2 years ago about this component resolver being with status
>> experimental and probably being dropped.
>> What is the current state of it? Will we support it or deprecate it ?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Martin Grigorov
>> jWeekend
>> Training, Consulting, Development
>> http://jWeekend.com
>>
>
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com
Re: Status of
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
if its not yet, all traces of it should be removed.
-igor
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I was updating the Wiki page for Wicket XML tags and
> attributes and I added wicket:component tag section.
> Now discussing the new .xsd with Attila I remembered some discussions
> from ~ 2 years ago about this component resolver being with status
> experimental and probably being dropped.
> What is the current state of it? Will we support it or deprecate it ?
>
>
> --
> Martin Grigorov
> jWeekend
> Training, Consulting, Development
> http://jWeekend.com
>
Re: Status of
Posted by Martin Makundi <ma...@koodaripalvelut.com>.
Ah.. good point ;)
2011/5/8 Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>:
> I talk about wicket:component, not about wicket:container.
>
> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Martin Makundi
> <ma...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
>> What's the best replacement for it? Adding components where html dom
>> does not allow? Renderbodyonly?
>>
>> **
>> Martin
>>
>> 2011/5/8 Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Recently I was updating the Wiki page for Wicket XML tags and
>>> attributes and I added wicket:component tag section.
>>> Now discussing the new .xsd with Attila I remembered some discussions
>>> from ~ 2 years ago about this component resolver being with status
>>> experimental and probably being dropped.
>>> What is the current state of it? Will we support it or deprecate it ?
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Martin Grigorov
>>> jWeekend
>>> Training, Consulting, Development
>>> http://jWeekend.com
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Martin Grigorov
> jWeekend
> Training, Consulting, Development
> http://jWeekend.com
>
Re: Status of
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
I talk about wicket:component, not about wicket:container.
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Martin Makundi
<ma...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> What's the best replacement for it? Adding components where html dom
> does not allow? Renderbodyonly?
>
> **
> Martin
>
> 2011/5/8 Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Recently I was updating the Wiki page for Wicket XML tags and
>> attributes and I added wicket:component tag section.
>> Now discussing the new .xsd with Attila I remembered some discussions
>> from ~ 2 years ago about this component resolver being with status
>> experimental and probably being dropped.
>> What is the current state of it? Will we support it or deprecate it ?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Martin Grigorov
>> jWeekend
>> Training, Consulting, Development
>> http://jWeekend.com
>>
>
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com
Re: Status of
Posted by Martin Makundi <ma...@koodaripalvelut.com>.
What's the best replacement for it? Adding components where html dom
does not allow? Renderbodyonly?
**
Martin
2011/5/8 Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I was updating the Wiki page for Wicket XML tags and
> attributes and I added wicket:component tag section.
> Now discussing the new .xsd with Attila I remembered some discussions
> from ~ 2 years ago about this component resolver being with status
> experimental and probably being dropped.
> What is the current state of it? Will we support it or deprecate it ?
>
>
> --
> Martin Grigorov
> jWeekend
> Training, Consulting, Development
> http://jWeekend.com
>