[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #11549: Operator for prometheus API interaction

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

potiuk commented on issue #11549:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11549#issuecomment-736858766


   I think we need to discuss this in the devlist. What is the future of Airflow in terms of new "providers" - whether we should incorporate more providers in Airflow after 2.0 and support them by community (and possibly grow it by accepting more committers from different areas) or whether we should slim it down and not accept wider contributions).
   
   This has never been discussed openly - and while I feel there are some opinions there, there, they are just that - opinions, until we make it a point and discuss in the community and make decisions. 
   
   I do not know personally what is my opinion at that because it is exactly this - it has not been discussed, neither pros/cons nor actual approach here has ever been discussed in the devlist as far as I can remember.
   
   @ashb  -> I think it would be great if you start this discussion at the devlist, before we lightly discard such ideas whether new providers will be added in the community or as 3rd-party implementations ?
   
   I think, whatever decision will be made, it should be made after raising the issue and public discussion at the devlist.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org