You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> on 2004/07/02 16:58:03 UTC
SAAJ 1.2, JAX-RPC 1.1, WS-I BP qualifies for a Axis 2.0 label?
Glen, Tom, Ias, Steve, others,
Since we are certifying against SAAJ 1.2 and JAX-RPC 1.1 and since
JAX-RPC 1.1 implies conformance to WS-I BP. This is major stuff going
on :) I also want to be ahead of the Axis C++ version #'s as well :)
:)
So, shall we up the label to 2.0? and release an updated beta next week?
Thanks,
dims
PS: Am re-running the SAAJ and JAX-RPC TCK's. We are getting close,
especially with Ias'
s checkins this morning :)
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
Re: SAAJ 1.2, JAX-RPC 1.1, WS-I BP qualifies for a Axis 2.0 label?
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
glen, tom,
thoughts?
-- dims
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 22:58:55 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana
<sa...@opensource.lk> wrote:
> I don't think this is a good idea .. the changes are incremental
> changes and not radical. I personal prefer to make major version
> changes when there's more than incremental changes.
>
> I do agree its good to be ahead of the Axis/C++ version #s ..
> but they're on a much faster release cycle. Part of it of course
> is because Axis/Java 1.0 was not a 1.0 like Axis/C++ was .. it had
> the benefit of a prior impl (Apache SOAP) .. so we really should've
> started with Axis/Java 3.0. However, since we started with 1.0, this
> seems like the wrong time to jump ship to 2.0.
>
> I'm -0 on this.
>
> Sanjiva.
> p.s.: We're not (and no one is) WSDL 2.0 supportive yet of course.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Loughran" <st...@apache.org>
> To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 10:39 PM
> Subject: Re: SAAJ 1.2, JAX-RPC 1.1, WS-I BP qualifies for a Axis 2.0 label?
>
> > Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > > Glen, Tom, Ias, Steve, others,
> > >
> > > Since we are certifying against SAAJ 1.2 and JAX-RPC 1.1 and since
> > > JAX-RPC 1.1 implies conformance to WS-I BP. This is major stuff going
> > > on :) I also want to be ahead of the Axis C++ version #'s as well :)
> > > :)
> > >
> > > So, shall we up the label to 2.0? and release an updated beta next week?
> >
> > Seems good to me. There has been a lot of change from 1.1. And given
> > WSDL1.1 went to to 2.0, we can only be compatible :)
> >
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
Re: SAAJ 1.2, JAX-RPC 1.1, WS-I BP qualifies for a Axis 2.0 label?
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
I don't think this is a good idea .. the changes are incremental
changes and not radical. I personal prefer to make major version
changes when there's more than incremental changes.
I do agree its good to be ahead of the Axis/C++ version #s ..
but they're on a much faster release cycle. Part of it of course
is because Axis/Java 1.0 was not a 1.0 like Axis/C++ was .. it had
the benefit of a prior impl (Apache SOAP) .. so we really should've
started with Axis/Java 3.0. However, since we started with 1.0, this
seems like the wrong time to jump ship to 2.0.
I'm -0 on this.
Sanjiva.
p.s.: We're not (and no one is) WSDL 2.0 supportive yet of course.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Loughran" <st...@apache.org>
To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: SAAJ 1.2, JAX-RPC 1.1, WS-I BP qualifies for a Axis 2.0 label?
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > Glen, Tom, Ias, Steve, others,
> >
> > Since we are certifying against SAAJ 1.2 and JAX-RPC 1.1 and since
> > JAX-RPC 1.1 implies conformance to WS-I BP. This is major stuff going
> > on :) I also want to be ahead of the Axis C++ version #'s as well :)
> > :)
> >
> > So, shall we up the label to 2.0? and release an updated beta next week?
>
> Seems good to me. There has been a lot of change from 1.1. And given
> WSDL1.1 went to to 2.0, we can only be compatible :)
>
Re: SAAJ 1.2, JAX-RPC 1.1, WS-I BP qualifies for a Axis 2.0 label?
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org>.
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Glen, Tom, Ias, Steve, others,
>
> Since we are certifying against SAAJ 1.2 and JAX-RPC 1.1 and since
> JAX-RPC 1.1 implies conformance to WS-I BP. This is major stuff going
> on :) I also want to be ahead of the Axis C++ version #'s as well :)
> :)
>
> So, shall we up the label to 2.0? and release an updated beta next week?
Seems good to me. There has been a lot of change from 1.1. And given
WSDL1.1 went to to 2.0, we can only be compatible :)
Re: SAAJ 1.2, JAX-RPC 1.1, WS-I BP qualifies for a Axis 2.0 label?
Posted by Richard Martin <rm...@essex.ac.uk>.
Where does this leave the axis2 source branch ( I note that the branches
from there down are empty, but the attic contains stuff - has this been
moved? )
Other than that I'm all for it - these are important yardsticks. +1
(even though I realise that it doesnt count from me)
Regards,
Richard
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>Glen, Tom, Ias, Steve, others,
>
>Since we are certifying against SAAJ 1.2 and JAX-RPC 1.1 and since
>JAX-RPC 1.1 implies conformance to WS-I BP. This is major stuff going
>on :) I also want to be ahead of the Axis C++ version #'s as well :)
>:)
>
>So, shall we up the label to 2.0? and release an updated beta next week?
>
>Thanks,
>dims
>
>PS: Am re-running the SAAJ and JAX-RPC TCK's. We are getting close,
>especially with Ias'
>s checkins this morning :)
>
>
>