You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@mxnet.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2018/12/06 05:35:08 UTC

[GitHub] apeforest removed a comment on issue #13362: Add NHWC layout support to Pooling (cuDNN only)

apeforest removed a comment on issue #13362: Add NHWC layout support to Pooling (cuDNN only)
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13362#issuecomment-444753750
 
 
   @DickJC123 Thanks for your detailed explanation about the operator selection logic. I like the way you used a boolean return type for `Forward()` and `Backward()` methods to choose the right operator implementation. Although it might be an elegant way, this method is not yet well received in the developer community. And all the other operators do not currently implement in this way. I am afraid that using it alone in this operator without a clear guideline may cause more confusion for prospect developers. Can you still follow the traditional way of declaring `Forward()` and `Backward()` function and maybe propose this in a separate thread to refactor the `Forward()` and `Backward()` with boolean return type? 

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services