You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Rick McGuire (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org> on 2006/05/02 23:53:46 UTC

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-1968) Session tetProvider() resolution not properly implementing search order.

Session tetProvider() resolution not properly implementing search order.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Key: GERONIMO-1968
         URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1968
     Project: Geronimo
        Type: Bug
    Security: public (Regular issues) 
  Components: mail  
    Versions: 1.1    
    Reporter: Rick McGuire
 Assigned to: Rick McGuire 
     Fix For: 1.1


The javamail Session.getProvider() method is supposed to check the session property "mail." + protocol + ".class" to see if a protocol provider is named by class name, and if one with that class name has not been loaded, then it proceeds with normal resoltuion.  The Geronimo version implements this as an either-or rather than a search order. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-1968) Session getProvider() resolution not properly implementing search order.

Posted by "Rick McGuire (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org>.
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1968?page=all ]

Rick McGuire updated GERONIMO-1968:
-----------------------------------

    Summary: Session getProvider() resolution not properly implementing search order.  (was: Session tetProvider() resolution not properly implementing search order.)

> Session getProvider() resolution not properly implementing search order.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: GERONIMO-1968
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1968
>      Project: Geronimo
>         Type: Bug
>     Security: public(Regular issues) 
>   Components: mail
>     Versions: 1.1
>     Reporter: Rick McGuire
>     Assignee: Rick McGuire
>      Fix For: 1.1

>
> The javamail Session.getProvider() method is supposed to check the session property "mail." + protocol + ".class" to see if a protocol provider is named by class name, and if one with that class name has not been loaded, then it proceeds with normal resoltuion.  The Geronimo version implements this as an either-or rather than a search order. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-1968) Session getProvider() resolution not properly implementing search order.

Posted by "Rick McGuire (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org>.
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1968?page=all ]
     
Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-1968:
------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Committed revision 399080

M    geronimo-spec-javamail/src/main/java/javax/mail/Session.java

> Session getProvider() resolution not properly implementing search order.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: GERONIMO-1968
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1968
>      Project: Geronimo
>         Type: Bug
>     Security: public(Regular issues) 
>   Components: mail
>     Versions: 1.1
>     Reporter: Rick McGuire
>     Assignee: Rick McGuire
>      Fix For: 1.1

>
> The javamail Session.getProvider() method is supposed to check the session property "mail." + protocol + ".class" to see if a protocol provider is named by class name, and if one with that class name has not been loaded, then it proceeds with normal resoltuion.  The Geronimo version implements this as an either-or rather than a search order. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira