You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Raja Pullela <ra...@citrix.com> on 2015/09/15 11:19:59 UTC
[BLOCKER] - Guest VMs are not getting IPs as the DHCP port is not
opened in VR
Hi,
JIRA - ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8843
Can someone please pick up this ticket ? This is failing a bunch of the BVTs tests in Basiczone.
Thanks,
Raja
Re: [BLOCKER] - Guest VMs are not getting IPs as the DHCP port is not
opened in VR
Posted by Rajani Karuturi <ra...@apache.org>.
completely agree.
We lack dev support for fixing and testing networking issues :(
PS: I feel like there should be document in github describing contributor /
reviewer / jira guidelines
~Rajani
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Wilder Rodrigues <
WRodrigues@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I did not say that the issues are not VR related, because they are. What I
> said was to not try fixing it by calling the bash scripts form within the
> python files.
>
> Those changes landed on master a few months ago, or more. The thing is
> that most of us rely on the simulator and there was few people actually
> testing them. We tested a lot, as much as we could at that time, but
> unfortunately the effort did not cover all the cases.
>
> By the way, that’s not an excuse. We just lacked support from the
> community before, which is actually being great now.
>
> From 6 blocker issues, 3 are VR related!
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12326765
>
> 1 I already fixed, but cannot create a PR because master VPC router was
> broken after the 9th September - which by the way, I have been
> reporting/looking into since Friday.
>
> We have 52 PRs opened and few people reviewing them, I mean, really
> reviewing. Most of the PRs haven’t been tested properly, which causes pain
> at the end.
>
> Now, if we want 4.6 out, without issues, let’s work together and stop LGTM
> PRs that do not contain:
>
> 1. Jira ticket
> 2. Proper description of what it fixes/improves
> 3. Unit and/or Integration tests
> 4. And was tested
>
> After 4.6 our first priority should be to get a proper CI environment that
> not only run simulator, but also KVM - at least.
>
> my 0.20 cents
>
> Cheers,
> Wilder
>
>
> On 16 Sep 2015, at 06:54, Rajani Karuturi <Ra...@citrix.com>
> wrote:
>
> I agree. Most of the blockers we see now are VR related.
>
> ~Rajani
>
>
>
> On 16-Sep-2015, at 10:15 am, Raja Pullela <ra...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> I agree with jayapal, so far none of the BVTs for the hypervisors are at
> 100% except for the simulator's.
> Also, changes/refactoring some of the very core functionality such as VR
> should be thought through and thoroughly tested before being pushed as the
> impact will be huge and stabilization will take time. At this point we are
> not sure what else is broken ???
>
> Also, we should review/critic such changes to make sure we don't spend
> time on it later on...
> Please note that Travis tests passing at 100% cannot be taken as the basis
> to think that the changes are good.
>
> my 2cents!
> Raja
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi@citrix.com
> <ja...@citrix.com>]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 9:46 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [BLOCKER] - Guest VMs are not getting IPs as the DHCP port is
> not opened in VR
>
> Hi Wilder,
>
> CLOUDSTACK-8843<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8843>
> This ticket is actually NOT regression. It is not implemented/tested for
> the basic zone VR.
> What I have observed in the VR refactor is that sanity testing of
> components the code affects is not done.
> Now we are spending time on fixing issues which were stable earlier.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
>
>
> On 15-Sep-2015, at 6:55 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
> wrodrigues@schubergphilis.com<mailto:wrodrigues@schubergphilis.com
> <wr...@schubergphilis.com>>> wrote:
>
> Hi Jayapal,
>
> I would not suggest to move back to the sceptres, but focus on fixing and
> for every fix test it very well so we get confidence. If we start calling
> scripts com the python code it will have a huge chance to become a real
> mess!
>
> Let’s stick to it and fix it and once it’s stable we can discuss a
> refactor of the thing from scratch - we already have some ideas.
>
> The most important point is: for everyone touching Java/Python code,
> please test your changes before creating PRs or LGTM other’s committers PRs.
>
> Cheers,
> Wilder
>
>
> On 15 Sep 2015, at 14:52, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <
> jayapalreddy.uradi@citrix.com<mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi@citrix.com
> <ja...@citrix.com>>> wrote:
>
> Wilder, That is true.
>
> All these issues are because of the VR refactoring. I don’t know what are
> the unit test cases run on VR refactor code.
> VR (shell) scripts are stabilized over years and now suddenly moved to
> new implementation. What we have figured out is that this new
> implementation is done only partially. What I am suggesting now to move
> ahead is to call the existing/old shell scripts in new implementation for
> configuring the VR to avoid spending time on unnecessary bugs.
> With current implementation we may see many issues in production for some
> time to come.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
>
> On 15-Sep-2015, at 5:57 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <
> wrodrigues@schubergphilis.com<mailto:wrodrigues@schubergphilis.com
> <wr...@schubergphilis.com>>> wrote:
>
> I have the feeling that we are fixing 1 issue and created 2.
>
> Please, make sure the routers tests are executed and green before creating
> the PR. I will do the same.
>
> Cheers,
> Wilder
>
>
> On 15 Sep 2015, at 14:23, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <
> jayapalreddy.uradi@citrix.com<mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi@citrix.com
> <ja...@citrix.com>>> wrote:
>
> Assigned to myself.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
> On 15-Sep-2015, at 2:49 pm, Raja Pullela <raja.pullela@citrix.com<
> mailto:raja.pullela@citrix.com <ra...@citrix.com>>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> JIRA - ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8843
> Can someone please pick up this ticket ? This is failing a bunch of the
> BVTs tests in Basiczone.
>
> Thanks,
> Raja
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [BLOCKER] - Guest VMs are not getting IPs as the DHCP port is
not opened in VR
Posted by Wilder Rodrigues <WR...@schubergphilis.com>.
Hi all,
I did not say that the issues are not VR related, because they are. What I said was to not try fixing it by calling the bash scripts form within the python files.
Those changes landed on master a few months ago, or more. The thing is that most of us rely on the simulator and there was few people actually testing them. We tested a lot, as much as we could at that time, but unfortunately the effort did not cover all the cases.
By the way, that’s not an excuse. We just lacked support from the community before, which is actually being great now.
>From 6 blocker issues, 3 are VR related!
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12326765
1 I already fixed, but cannot create a PR because master VPC router was broken after the 9th September - which by the way, I have been reporting/looking into since Friday.
We have 52 PRs opened and few people reviewing them, I mean, really reviewing. Most of the PRs haven’t been tested properly, which causes pain at the end.
Now, if we want 4.6 out, without issues, let’s work together and stop LGTM PRs that do not contain:
1. Jira ticket
2. Proper description of what it fixes/improves
3. Unit and/or Integration tests
4. And was tested
After 4.6 our first priority should be to get a proper CI environment that not only run simulator, but also KVM - at least.
my 0.20 cents
Cheers,
Wilder
On 16 Sep 2015, at 06:54, Rajani Karuturi <Ra...@citrix.com>> wrote:
I agree. Most of the blockers we see now are VR related.
~Rajani
On 16-Sep-2015, at 10:15 am, Raja Pullela <ra...@citrix.com>> wrote:
I agree with jayapal, so far none of the BVTs for the hypervisors are at 100% except for the simulator's.
Also, changes/refactoring some of the very core functionality such as VR should be thought through and thoroughly tested before being pushed as the impact will be huge and stabilization will take time. At this point we are not sure what else is broken ???
Also, we should review/critic such changes to make sure we don't spend time on it later on...
Please note that Travis tests passing at 100% cannot be taken as the basis to think that the changes are good.
my 2cents!
Raja
-----Original Message-----
From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 9:46 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<ma...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [BLOCKER] - Guest VMs are not getting IPs as the DHCP port is not opened in VR
Hi Wilder,
CLOUDSTACK-8843<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8843> This ticket is actually NOT regression. It is not implemented/tested for the basic zone VR.
What I have observed in the VR refactor is that sanity testing of components the code affects is not done.
Now we are spending time on fixing issues which were stable earlier.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 15-Sep-2015, at 6:55 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <wr...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote:
Hi Jayapal,
I would not suggest to move back to the sceptres, but focus on fixing and for every fix test it very well so we get confidence. If we start calling scripts com the python code it will have a huge chance to become a real mess!
Let’s stick to it and fix it and once it’s stable we can discuss a refactor of the thing from scratch - we already have some ideas.
The most important point is: for everyone touching Java/Python code, please test your changes before creating PRs or LGTM other’s committers PRs.
Cheers,
Wilder
On 15 Sep 2015, at 14:52, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <ja...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Wilder, That is true.
All these issues are because of the VR refactoring. I don’t know what are the unit test cases run on VR refactor code.
VR (shell) scripts are stabilized over years and now suddenly moved to new implementation. What we have figured out is that this new implementation is done only partially. What I am suggesting now to move ahead is to call the existing/old shell scripts in new implementation for configuring the VR to avoid spending time on unnecessary bugs.
With current implementation we may see many issues in production for some time to come.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 15-Sep-2015, at 5:57 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <wr...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote:
I have the feeling that we are fixing 1 issue and created 2.
Please, make sure the routers tests are executed and green before creating the PR. I will do the same.
Cheers,
Wilder
On 15 Sep 2015, at 14:23, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <ja...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Assigned to myself.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 15-Sep-2015, at 2:49 pm, Raja Pullela <ra...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Hi,
JIRA - ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8843
Can someone please pick up this ticket ? This is failing a bunch of the BVTs tests in Basiczone.
Thanks,
Raja
Re: [BLOCKER] - Guest VMs are not getting IPs as the DHCP port is
not opened in VR
Posted by Rajani Karuturi <Ra...@citrix.com>.
I agree. Most of the blockers we see now are VR related.
~Rajani
On 16-Sep-2015, at 10:15 am, Raja Pullela <ra...@citrix.com> wrote:
> I agree with jayapal, so far none of the BVTs for the hypervisors are at 100% except for the simulator's.
> Also, changes/refactoring some of the very core functionality such as VR should be thought through and thoroughly tested before being pushed as the impact will be huge and stabilization will take time. At this point we are not sure what else is broken ???
>
> Also, we should review/critic such changes to make sure we don't spend time on it later on...
> Please note that Travis tests passing at 100% cannot be taken as the basis to think that the changes are good.
>
> my 2cents!
> Raja
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 9:46 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [BLOCKER] - Guest VMs are not getting IPs as the DHCP port is not opened in VR
>
> Hi Wilder,
>
> CLOUDSTACK-8843<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8843> This ticket is actually NOT regression. It is not implemented/tested for the basic zone VR.
> What I have observed in the VR refactor is that sanity testing of components the code affects is not done.
> Now we are spending time on fixing issues which were stable earlier.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
>
>
> On 15-Sep-2015, at 6:55 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <wr...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Jayapal,
>
> I would not suggest to move back to the sceptres, but focus on fixing and for every fix test it very well so we get confidence. If we start calling scripts com the python code it will have a huge chance to become a real mess!
>
> Let’s stick to it and fix it and once it’s stable we can discuss a refactor of the thing from scratch - we already have some ideas.
>
> The most important point is: for everyone touching Java/Python code, please test your changes before creating PRs or LGTM other’s committers PRs.
>
> Cheers,
> Wilder
>
>
> On 15 Sep 2015, at 14:52, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <ja...@citrix.com>> wrote:
>
> Wilder, That is true.
>
> All these issues are because of the VR refactoring. I don’t know what are the unit test cases run on VR refactor code.
> VR (shell) scripts are stabilized over years and now suddenly moved to new implementation. What we have figured out is that this new implementation is done only partially. What I am suggesting now to move ahead is to call the existing/old shell scripts in new implementation for configuring the VR to avoid spending time on unnecessary bugs.
> With current implementation we may see many issues in production for some time to come.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
>
> On 15-Sep-2015, at 5:57 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <wr...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote:
>
> I have the feeling that we are fixing 1 issue and created 2.
>
> Please, make sure the routers tests are executed and green before creating the PR. I will do the same.
>
> Cheers,
> Wilder
>
>
> On 15 Sep 2015, at 14:23, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <ja...@citrix.com>> wrote:
>
> Assigned to myself.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
> On 15-Sep-2015, at 2:49 pm, Raja Pullela <ra...@citrix.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> JIRA - ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8843
> Can someone please pick up this ticket ? This is failing a bunch of the BVTs tests in Basiczone.
>
> Thanks,
> Raja
>
>
>
>
>
RE: [BLOCKER] - Guest VMs are not getting IPs as the DHCP port is
not opened in VR
Posted by Raja Pullela <ra...@citrix.com>.
I agree with jayapal, so far none of the BVTs for the hypervisors are at 100% except for the simulator's.
Also, changes/refactoring some of the very core functionality such as VR should be thought through and thoroughly tested before being pushed as the impact will be huge and stabilization will take time. At this point we are not sure what else is broken ???
Also, we should review/critic such changes to make sure we don't spend time on it later on...
Please note that Travis tests passing at 100% cannot be taken as the basis to think that the changes are good.
my 2cents!
Raja
-----Original Message-----
From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.uradi@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 9:46 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [BLOCKER] - Guest VMs are not getting IPs as the DHCP port is not opened in VR
Hi Wilder,
CLOUDSTACK-8843<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8843> This ticket is actually NOT regression. It is not implemented/tested for the basic zone VR.
What I have observed in the VR refactor is that sanity testing of components the code affects is not done.
Now we are spending time on fixing issues which were stable earlier.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 15-Sep-2015, at 6:55 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <wr...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote:
Hi Jayapal,
I would not suggest to move back to the sceptres, but focus on fixing and for every fix test it very well so we get confidence. If we start calling scripts com the python code it will have a huge chance to become a real mess!
Let’s stick to it and fix it and once it’s stable we can discuss a refactor of the thing from scratch - we already have some ideas.
The most important point is: for everyone touching Java/Python code, please test your changes before creating PRs or LGTM other’s committers PRs.
Cheers,
Wilder
On 15 Sep 2015, at 14:52, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <ja...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Wilder, That is true.
All these issues are because of the VR refactoring. I don’t know what are the unit test cases run on VR refactor code.
VR (shell) scripts are stabilized over years and now suddenly moved to new implementation. What we have figured out is that this new implementation is done only partially. What I am suggesting now to move ahead is to call the existing/old shell scripts in new implementation for configuring the VR to avoid spending time on unnecessary bugs.
With current implementation we may see many issues in production for some time to come.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 15-Sep-2015, at 5:57 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <wr...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote:
I have the feeling that we are fixing 1 issue and created 2.
Please, make sure the routers tests are executed and green before creating the PR. I will do the same.
Cheers,
Wilder
On 15 Sep 2015, at 14:23, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <ja...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Assigned to myself.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 15-Sep-2015, at 2:49 pm, Raja Pullela <ra...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Hi,
JIRA - ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8843
Can someone please pick up this ticket ? This is failing a bunch of the BVTs tests in Basiczone.
Thanks,
Raja
Re: [BLOCKER] - Guest VMs are not getting IPs as the DHCP port is
not opened in VR
Posted by Jayapal Reddy Uradi <ja...@citrix.com>.
Hi Wilder,
CLOUDSTACK-8843<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8843> This ticket is actually NOT regression. It is not implemented/tested for the basic zone VR.
What I have observed in the VR refactor is that sanity testing of components the code affects is not done.
Now we are spending time on fixing issues which were stable earlier.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 15-Sep-2015, at 6:55 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <wr...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote:
Hi Jayapal,
I would not suggest to move back to the sceptres, but focus on fixing and for every fix test it very well so we get confidence. If we start calling scripts com the python code it will have a huge chance to become a real mess!
Let’s stick to it and fix it and once it’s stable we can discuss a refactor of the thing from scratch - we already have some ideas.
The most important point is: for everyone touching Java/Python code, please test your changes before creating PRs or LGTM other’s committers PRs.
Cheers,
Wilder
On 15 Sep 2015, at 14:52, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <ja...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Wilder, That is true.
All these issues are because of the VR refactoring. I don’t know what are the unit test cases run on VR refactor code.
VR (shell) scripts are stabilized over years and now suddenly moved to new implementation. What we have figured out is that this new implementation is done only partially. What I am suggesting now to move ahead is to call the existing/old shell scripts in new implementation for configuring the VR to avoid spending time on unnecessary bugs.
With current implementation we may see many issues in production for some time to come.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 15-Sep-2015, at 5:57 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <wr...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote:
I have the feeling that we are fixing 1 issue and created 2.
Please, make sure the routers tests are executed and green before creating the PR. I will do the same.
Cheers,
Wilder
On 15 Sep 2015, at 14:23, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <ja...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Assigned to myself.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 15-Sep-2015, at 2:49 pm, Raja Pullela <ra...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Hi,
JIRA - ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8843
Can someone please pick up this ticket ? This is failing a bunch of the BVTs tests in Basiczone.
Thanks,
Raja
Re: [BLOCKER] - Guest VMs are not getting IPs as the DHCP port is
not opened in VR
Posted by Wilder Rodrigues <WR...@schubergphilis.com>.
Hi Jayapal,
I would not suggest to move back to the sceptres, but focus on fixing and for every fix test it very well so we get confidence. If we start calling scripts com the python code it will have a huge chance to become a real mess!
Let’s stick to it and fix it and once it’s stable we can discuss a refactor of the thing from scratch - we already have some ideas.
The most important point is: for everyone touching Java/Python code, please test your changes before creating PRs or LGTM other’s committers PRs.
Cheers,
Wilder
> On 15 Sep 2015, at 14:52, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <ja...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> Wilder, That is true.
>
> All these issues are because of the VR refactoring. I don’t know what are the unit test cases run on VR refactor code.
> VR (shell) scripts are stabilized over years and now suddenly moved to new implementation. What we have figured out is that this new implementation is done only partially. What I am suggesting now to move ahead is to call the existing/old shell scripts in new implementation for configuring the VR to avoid spending time on unnecessary bugs.
> With current implementation we may see many issues in production for some time to come.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
>
>> On 15-Sep-2015, at 5:57 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <wr...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
>>
>> I have the feeling that we are fixing 1 issue and created 2.
>>
>> Please, make sure the routers tests are executed and green before creating the PR. I will do the same.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Wilder
>>
>>
>>> On 15 Sep 2015, at 14:23, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <ja...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Assigned to myself.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jayapal
>>>> On 15-Sep-2015, at 2:49 pm, Raja Pullela <ra...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> JIRA - ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8843
>>>> Can someone please pick up this ticket ? This is failing a bunch of the BVTs tests in Basiczone.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Raja
>>>
>>
>
Re: [BLOCKER] - Guest VMs are not getting IPs as the DHCP port is
not opened in VR
Posted by Jayapal Reddy Uradi <ja...@citrix.com>.
Wilder, That is true.
All these issues are because of the VR refactoring. I don’t know what are the unit test cases run on VR refactor code.
VR (shell) scripts are stabilized over years and now suddenly moved to new implementation. What we have figured out is that this new implementation is done only partially. What I am suggesting now to move ahead is to call the existing/old shell scripts in new implementation for configuring the VR to avoid spending time on unnecessary bugs.
With current implementation we may see many issues in production for some time to come.
Thanks,
Jayapal
> On 15-Sep-2015, at 5:57 pm, Wilder Rodrigues <wr...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
>
> I have the feeling that we are fixing 1 issue and created 2.
>
> Please, make sure the routers tests are executed and green before creating the PR. I will do the same.
>
> Cheers,
> Wilder
>
>
>> On 15 Sep 2015, at 14:23, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <ja...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>> Assigned to myself.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jayapal
>>> On 15-Sep-2015, at 2:49 pm, Raja Pullela <ra...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> JIRA - ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8843
>>> Can someone please pick up this ticket ? This is failing a bunch of the BVTs tests in Basiczone.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Raja
>>
>
Re: [BLOCKER] - Guest VMs are not getting IPs as the DHCP port is
not opened in VR
Posted by Wilder Rodrigues <WR...@schubergphilis.com>.
I have the feeling that we are fixing 1 issue and created 2.
Please, make sure the routers tests are executed and green before creating the PR. I will do the same.
Cheers,
Wilder
> On 15 Sep 2015, at 14:23, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <ja...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> Assigned to myself.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
>> On 15-Sep-2015, at 2:49 pm, Raja Pullela <ra...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> JIRA - ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8843
>> Can someone please pick up this ticket ? This is failing a bunch of the BVTs tests in Basiczone.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Raja
>
Re: [BLOCKER] - Guest VMs are not getting IPs as the DHCP port is
not opened in VR
Posted by Jayapal Reddy Uradi <ja...@citrix.com>.
Assigned to myself.
Thanks,
Jayapal
> On 15-Sep-2015, at 2:49 pm, Raja Pullela <ra...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> JIRA - ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8843
> Can someone please pick up this ticket ? This is failing a bunch of the BVTs tests in Basiczone.
>
> Thanks,
> Raja