You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Duane Hill <d....@yournetplus.com> on 2005/10/30 14:48:22 UTC

unparsable relay

Hello All,

  Did  some  searching but couldn't really come up with much. Is there
  anything  that  can be done to correct unparsable relays? I see then
  in the SA header markup every once in a while. It is causing a small
  issue with some Spam getting through.

  If this has been covered before, just tell me to go search more :)
  
--

"This message is made of 100% recycled electrons."


Re: unparsable relay

Posted by Duane Hill <d....@yournetplus.com>.
On Sunday, October 30, 2005 at 11:31:29 PM, usebsd@free.fr confabulated:

> Duane Hill a écrit :

>>Received: from support@yournetplus.com
>>  by admin.mwci.net (CommuniGate Pro GROUP 4.2.8)
>>  with GROUP id 166248333; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:03:56 +0000
>>  
>>
> GROUP is not a known method and support@foo is not a known from. the 
> communigate guys should really put these between parens. the with 
> methods must be registered at IANA, uless communigate developpers want
> us to consider all mail relayed through their bugware as spam.

> now, should SA ignore unknown methods?

Your  guidance  is much appreciated! I will address this with them and
see what is said.

--

"This message is made of 100% recycled electrons."


Re: unparsable relay

Posted by mouss <us...@free.fr>.
Duane Hill a écrit :

>Received: from support@yournetplus.com
>  by admin.mwci.net (CommuniGate Pro GROUP 4.2.8)
>  with GROUP id 166248333; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:03:56 +0000
>  
>
GROUP is not a known method and support@foo is not a known from. the 
communigate guys should really put these between parens. the with 
methods must be registered at IANA, uless communigate developpers want 
us to consider all mail relayed through their bugware as spam.

now, should SA ignore unknown methods?

Re: unparsable relay

Posted by Duane Hill <d....@yournetplus.com>.
On Sunday, October 30, 2005 at 4:33:48 PM, usebsd@free.fr confabulated:

> Duane Hill a écrit :

>>Hello All,
>>
>>  Did  some  searching but couldn't really come up with much. Is there
>>  anything  that  can be done to correct unparsable relays? I see then
>>  in the SA header markup every once in a while. It is causing a small
>>  issue with some Spam getting through.
>>
>>  If this has been covered before, just tell me to go search more :)
>>  
> can you post samples?

This particular one happens to be a legit message.

Return-Path: <mc...@lists.mci.com>
Received: by admin.mwci.net (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.2.8)
  with PIPE id 166248378; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:03:58 +0000
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on cgppri.ndunet.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: Hits:-2.3 Bayes:0.0000 Bayes-Lrnd:ham Tests:BAYES_00,
        UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
Received: from support@yournetplus.com
  by admin.mwci.net (CommuniGate Pro GROUP 4.2.8)
  with GROUP id 166248333; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:03:56 +0000
X-Autogenerated: group
Received: from pmesmtp01.mci.com ([199.249.20.1] verified)
  by admin.mwci.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8)
  with ESMTP id 166248315 for support@yournetplus.com; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:03:56 +0000
Received: from dgismtp01.wcomnet.com ([166.38.58.141])
 by firewall.mci.com (Iplanet MTA 5.2)
 with ESMTP id <0I...@firewall.mci.com> for support@yournetplus.com;
 Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:03:30 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from dgismtp01.wcomnet.com by dgismtp01.mcilink.com
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003))
 with SMTP id <0I...@dgismtp01.mcilink.com>; Sun,
 30 Oct 2005 20:03:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from pmmlists1.mcilink.com ([166.38.62.106])
 by dgismtp01.mcilink.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar
 18 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I...@dgismtp01.mcilink.com>; Sun,
 30 Oct 2005 20:03:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from dgismtp04.wcomnet.com ([166.38.58.144])
 by pmmlists1.mcilink.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID#
 0-72210U28000L34000S0V35)
 with ESMTP id com for <mc...@lists.mci.com>; Sun,
 30 Oct 2005 20:03:25 +0000
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON.dgismtp04.mcilink.com by dgismtp04.mcilink.com
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003))
 id <0I...@dgismtp04.mcilink.com> for mci_irsc_maints@lists.mci.com;
 Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:03:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from dgismtp04.wcomnet.com by dgismtp04.mcilink.com
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003))
 with SMTP id <0I...@dgismtp04.mcilink.com> for
 mci_irsc_maints@lists.mci.com; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:03:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from imr0.ash.ops.us.uu.net ([153.39.43.11])
 by dgismtp04.mcilink.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar
 18 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I...@dgismtp04.mcilink.com>; Sun,
 30 Oct 2005 20:03:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from noclogin2.sfld.ops.us.uu.net by imr0.ash.ops.us.uu.net with
 ESMTP  (peer crosschecked as: noclogin2.sfld.ops.us.uu.net [147.225.16.31])
        id j9UK3NWN004278; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:03:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from localhost by noclogin2.sfld.ops.us.uu.net with SMTP
        (peer crosschecked as: kat@localhost)   id j9UK3MxE008759; Sun,
 30 Oct 2005 20:03:22 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:03:22 +0000 (GMT)
From: MCI Reseller Support Center <rs...@mci.com>
Subject: Urgent Maintenance Announcements for Thursday, November 3, 2005
X-Sender: kat@noclogin2.sfld.ops.us.uu.net
To: Undisclosed.Recipients@mci.com
Message-id:
 <Pi...@noclogin2.sfld.ops.us.uu.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

--

"This message is made of 100% recycled electrons."


Re: unparsable relay

Posted by mouss <us...@free.fr>.
Duane Hill a écrit :

>Hello All,
>
>  Did  some  searching but couldn't really come up with much. Is there
>  anything  that  can be done to correct unparsable relays? I see then
>  in the SA header markup every once in a while. It is causing a small
>  issue with some Spam getting through.
>
>  If this has been covered before, just tell me to go search more :)
>  
>--
>
>"This message is made of 100% recycled electrons."
>
>
>  
>
can you post samples?