You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@giraph.apache.org by Jakob Homan <jg...@gmail.com> on 2011/10/27 02:13:07 UTC

Relax RTC on web site commits?

Currently we're doing individual JIRAs for each change to the website,
which is a bunch of ceremony for a routine matter.  In GIRAPH-66, we
discussed relaxing this requirement for website changes.  This is an
approach we've used in other projects and it has worked.  I'm +1.
Thoughts?

Re: Relax RTC on web site commits?

Posted by Owen O'Malley <ow...@hortonworks.com>.
+1

Re: Relax RTC on web site commits?

Posted by Avery Ching <ac...@apache.org>.
+1.

On 10/26/11 5:42 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Jakob Homan<jg...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> Currently we're doing individual JIRAs for each change to the website,
>> which is a bunch of ceremony for a routine matter.  In GIRAPH-66, we
>> discussed relaxing this requirement for website changes.  This is an
>> approach we've used in other projects and it has worked.  I'm +1.
>> Thoughts?
>>
>
>


Re: Relax RTC on web site commits?

Posted by Dmitriy Ryaboy <dm...@twitter.com>.
+1

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Jakob Homan <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Currently we're doing individual JIRAs for each change to the website,
> which is a bunch of ceremony for a routine matter.  In GIRAPH-66, we
> discussed relaxing this requirement for website changes.  This is an
> approach we've used in other projects and it has worked.  I'm +1.
> Thoughts?
>



-- 
Dmitriy V Ryaboy
Twitter Analytics
http://twitter.com/squarecog

Re: Relax RTC on web site commits?

Posted by Hyunsik Choi <hy...@apache.org>.
+1


On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Jakob Homan <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Currently we're doing individual JIRAs for each change to the website,
> which is a bunch of ceremony for a routine matter.  In GIRAPH-66, we
> discussed relaxing this requirement for website changes.  This is an
> approach we've used in other projects and it has worked.  I'm +1.
> Thoughts?
>