You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Simon Zhou (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/03/31 22:01:41 UTC

[jira] [Created] (CASSANDRA-13397) Return value of CountDownLatch.await() not being checked

Simon Zhou created CASSANDRA-13397:
--------------------------------------

             Summary: Return value of CountDownLatch.await() not being checked
                 Key: CASSANDRA-13397
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13397
             Project: Cassandra
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Simon Zhou
            Assignee: Simon Zhou


While looking into repair code, I realize that we should check return value of CountDownLatch.await(). However, there are some places we don't check and some of them may cause bad consequent behavior, like in ActiveRepairService#prepareForRepair and StorageProxy#describeSchemaVersions. I haven't checked the original version that has this bug but at least StorageProxy#describeSchemaVersions has the bug starting from 2010. Code to reproduce:
{code}
    public static void testLatch() throws InterruptedException {
        CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(2);
        latch.countDown();

        new Thread(() -> {
            try {
                Thread.sleep(1200);
            } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                System.err.println("interrupted");
            }
            latch.countDown();
            System.out.println("counted down");
        }).start();


        latch.await(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
        if (latch.getCount() > 0) {
            System.err.println("failed");
        } else {
            System.out.println("success");
        }
    }
{code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)