You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Bojan Smojver <bo...@binarix.com> on 2001/09/17 02:21:15 UTC
mod_webapp: statically linked Apache
Hi Pier,
I can see by the number of recent commits that you are very busy with
mod_webapp. Can you tell me if the new stuff will include support for
mod_webapp with a statically linked Apache of is it still DSO only?
Bojan
Re: mod_webapp: statically linked Apache
Posted by Pier Fumagalli <pi...@betaversion.org>.
"Bojan Smojver" <bo...@binarix.com> wrote:
> Thanks. I've just noticed your post at Bugzilla. Nice touch ;-)
If I don't post it there, I'll forget about it in less than 5 minutes :) Now
it's in my "reminded bugs" default query :)
> No hurry at all (I'm not even using TC 4 yet, just keeping my options
> open). And mod_jk does a nice job anyway...
Yeah... Right now I want the sucker to BUILD :)
Pier
Re: mod_webapp: statically linked Apache
Posted by Bojan Smojver <bo...@binarix.com>.
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>
> "Bojan Smojver" <bo...@binarix.com> wrote:
>
> > Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> >>
> >> "Bojan Smojver" <bo...@binarix.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Pier,
> >>>
> >>> I can see by the number of recent commits that you are very busy with
> >>> mod_webapp. Can you tell me if the new stuff will include support for
> >>> mod_webapp with a statically linked Apache of is it still DSO only?
> >>
> >> It's still DSO-only... Any particular reason why you can't use mod_so?
> >>
> >> Pier
> >
> > It's just that statically linked Apache is faster then the DSO version,
> > uses less memory and mod_jk (which I use now with TC 3.3) works with it
> > just fine (I use my own script to build mod_jk shipped with TC 3.3 and
> > j-t-c version comes with support for statically linked Apache).
> >
> > Apart from that, no, not really.
>
> Faster? Well, probably yes, during startup... But once you have the pointer
> to the module structure, it's as-fast as statically linked...
>
> Can be done (after 4.0 final).
Thanks. I've just noticed your post at Bugzilla. Nice touch ;-)
No hurry at all (I'm not even using TC 4 yet, just keeping my options
open). And mod_jk does a nice job anyway...
Bojan
Re: mod_webapp: statically linked Apache
Posted by Pier Fumagalli <pi...@betaversion.org>.
"Bojan Smojver" <bo...@binarix.com> wrote:
> Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>>
>> "Bojan Smojver" <bo...@binarix.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Pier,
>>>
>>> I can see by the number of recent commits that you are very busy with
>>> mod_webapp. Can you tell me if the new stuff will include support for
>>> mod_webapp with a statically linked Apache of is it still DSO only?
>>
>> It's still DSO-only... Any particular reason why you can't use mod_so?
>>
>> Pier
>
> It's just that statically linked Apache is faster then the DSO version,
> uses less memory and mod_jk (which I use now with TC 3.3) works with it
> just fine (I use my own script to build mod_jk shipped with TC 3.3 and
> j-t-c version comes with support for statically linked Apache).
>
> Apart from that, no, not really.
Faster? Well, probably yes, during startup... But once you have the pointer
to the module structure, it's as-fast as statically linked...
Can be done (after 4.0 final).
Pier
Re: mod_webapp: statically linked Apache
Posted by Bojan Smojver <bo...@binarix.com>.
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>
> "Bojan Smojver" <bo...@binarix.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Pier,
> >
> > I can see by the number of recent commits that you are very busy with
> > mod_webapp. Can you tell me if the new stuff will include support for
> > mod_webapp with a statically linked Apache of is it still DSO only?
>
> It's still DSO-only... Any particular reason why you can't use mod_so?
>
> Pier
It's just that statically linked Apache is faster then the DSO version,
uses less memory and mod_jk (which I use now with TC 3.3) works with it
just fine (I use my own script to build mod_jk shipped with TC 3.3 and
j-t-c version comes with support for statically linked Apache).
Apart from that, no, not really.
Bojan
Re: mod_webapp: statically linked Apache
Posted by Pier Fumagalli <pi...@betaversion.org>.
"Bojan Smojver" <bo...@binarix.com> wrote:
> Hi Pier,
>
> I can see by the number of recent commits that you are very busy with
> mod_webapp. Can you tell me if the new stuff will include support for
> mod_webapp with a statically linked Apache of is it still DSO only?
It's still DSO-only... Any particular reason why you can't use mod_so?
Pier