You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@cocoon.apache.org by up...@apache.org on 2003/07/01 14:37:49 UTC
cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/documentation/xdocs/userdocs/concepts persistence.xml
upayavira 2003/07/01 05:37:48
Modified: src/documentation/xdocs/userdocs/concepts persistence.xml
Log:
Fixing broken link in CVS, reported as Bug 21218 by cgaffga at triplemind.com.
Does the site now need to be rebuilt?
Upayavira
Revision Changes Path
1.2 +1 -1 cocoon-2.1/src/documentation/xdocs/userdocs/concepts/persistence.xml
Index: persistence.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/cocoon-2.1/src/documentation/xdocs/userdocs/concepts/persistence.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- persistence.xml 9 Mar 2003 00:08:18 -0000 1.1
+++ persistence.xml 1 Jul 2003 12:37:47 -0000 1.2
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
have problems when the filenames are very long.</p>
</s1>
<s1 title="Jisp based persistence:">
- <p>The aim of the <link href="http://www.coyotegulch.com/algorithm/jisp/index.html">Jisp
+ <p>The aim of the <link href="http://www.coyotegulch.com/jisp/index.html">Jisp
based</link> persistence is to provide a more scalable persistence. The objects
are stored in an indexed file, which uses a B-Tree alghorithm to store the objects.
This is a more elegant and fast solution, especially when you have to handle many
Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/documentation/xdocs/userdocs/concepts
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@upaya.co.uk>.
Joerg wrote:
> > Does the site now need to be rebuilt?
>
> To have the change online: yes. But there is no need to do it after
> every change. Much was done since the last website update, the next
> one will be done after the next release - at least this makes most
> sense IMO.
Thanks. Just wanted to check.
Regards, Upayavira
Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/documentation/xdocs/userdocs/concepts
persistence.xml
Posted by Joerg Heinicke <jo...@gmx.de>.
upayavira@apache.org wrote:
> upayavira 2003/07/01 05:37:48
>
> Modified: src/documentation/xdocs/userdocs/concepts persistence.xml
> Log:
> Fixing broken link in CVS, reported as Bug 21218 by cgaffga at triplemind.com.
>
> Does the site now need to be rebuilt?
To have the change online: yes. But there is no need to do it after
every change. Much was done since the last website update, the next one
will be done after the next release - at least this makes most sense IMO.
Joerg