You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> on 2007/08/15 17:06:43 UTC

2.0.1 Release plans

Looks like the security issues were addressed and are checked into  
branches/2.0.1.

I am following up on any small changes I feel we can safely put in  
and am wearing my release manager hat trying to balance risk / reward.

I also changed to 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT as I'm trying out the Maven release  
plugin.

Re: 2.0.1 Release plans

Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
+1. The Tuscany/Geronimo integration are affected by these two issues.

Thanks,
Raymond
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Vamsavardhana Reddy 
  To: dev@geronimo.apache.org 
  Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 8:45 AM
  Subject: Re: 2.0.1 Release plans


  Please consider the following two revisions:

  o  Rev 565355 :  PluginInstallerGBean fails to find available artifacts when the repository URL does not end with "/".
  o  Rev 563782 : Plugin installer downloads a different version of dependency than the one specified 

  Vamsi



  On 8/15/07, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
    Looks like the security issues were addressed and are checked into
    branches/2.0.1.

    I am following up on any small changes I feel we can safely put in
    and am wearing my release manager hat trying to balance risk / reward. 

    I also changed to 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT as I'm trying out the Maven release
    plugin.

Re: 2.0.1 Release plans

Posted by Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com>.
Please consider the following two revisions:

o  Rev 565355 :  PluginInstallerGBean fails to find available artifacts when
the repository URL does not end with "/".
o  Rev 563782 : Plugin installer downloads a different version of dependency
than the one specified

Vamsi


On 8/15/07, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>
> Looks like the security issues were addressed and are checked into
> branches/2.0.1.
>
> I am following up on any small changes I feel we can safely put in
> and am wearing my release manager hat trying to balance risk / reward.
>
> I also changed to 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT as I'm trying out the Maven release
> plugin.
>

Re: 2.0.1 Release plans

Posted by Anita Kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com>.
+1

Cheers!
Anita

--- Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:

> Please consider the following change in 2.0.x, which allows Windows
> users to 
> rebuild the server from source -
> 
> GERONIMO-3410 added copy of
> jspc-maven-plugin-2.0-alpha-1-20070806.170854-1 to 
> our build repo
> 
> Revisions 565833, 565837, 565885
> 
> 
> I can make the change if you'd like some help...
> 
> -Donald
> 
> 
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> > Looks like the security issues were addressed and are checked into 
> > branches/2.0.1.
> > 
> > I am following up on any small changes I feel we can safely put in
> and 
> > am wearing my release manager hat trying to balance risk / reward.
> > 
> > I also changed to 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT as I'm trying out the Maven
> release 
> > plugin.
> > 
> > 
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center.
http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/

Re: 2.0.1 Release plans

Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
Please consider the following change in 2.0.x, which allows Windows users to 
rebuild the server from source -

GERONIMO-3410 added copy of jspc-maven-plugin-2.0-alpha-1-20070806.170854-1 to 
our build repo

Revisions 565833, 565837, 565885


I can make the change if you'd like some help...

-Donald


Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> Looks like the security issues were addressed and are checked into 
> branches/2.0.1.
> 
> I am following up on any small changes I feel we can safely put in and 
> am wearing my release manager hat trying to balance risk / reward.
> 
> I also changed to 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT as I'm trying out the Maven release 
> plugin.
> 
>