You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-user@logging.apache.org by Steve Cohen <St...@ignitesports.com> on 2002/04/10 23:35:01 UTC
log4j vs jdk 1.4 logging
I am in the position of recommending the adoption of either something like log4j or the jdk 1.4 logging classes to replace a home-grown logging system that has seen better days.
Can someone point me at an article comparing log4j to jdk1.4 java.util.logging? Or failing that, give me their opinion on the pros and cons of each?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Cohen
Sr. Software Engineer
Ignite Sports, Inc.
stevec@ignitesports.com
Re: log4j vs jdk 1.4 logging
Posted by Scott Farquhar <sc...@atlassian.com>.
Google is your friend:
http://www.google.com/search?q=log4j+vs+1.4
http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/critique.html
http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/critique2.html
Cheers,
Scott
Steve Cohen wrote:
> I am in the position of recommending the adoption of either something like log4j or the jdk 1.4 logging classes to replace a home-grown logging system that has seen better days.
>
> Can someone point me at an article comparing log4j to jdk1.4 java.util.logging? Or failing that, give me their opinion on the pros and cons of each?
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Steve Cohen
> Sr. Software Engineer
> Ignite Sports, Inc.
> stevec@ignitesports.com
>
>
--
Scott Farquhar :: scott@atlassian.com
Atlassian :: http://www.atlassian.com
Supporting YOUR J2EE World
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>