You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by "Andy Seaborne (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/01/07 09:46:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (JENA-1808) Incorrect validation returned when
using the Fuseki SHACL processor
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-1808:
--------------------------------
Description:
I'm new to Jena Fuseki and SHACL, so I thought I would use the example from section 1.4 of the W3C Shapes Constraint Language document to insure I had everything up and running correctly. Unfortunately, when I upload the example graph and run their example shape graph, Fuseki indicates the data graph is validated:
{noformat}$ ./validate-data.sh
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix sh: <http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
[ a sh:ValidationReport ;
sh:conforms true
] .
$
{noformat}
I expected a validation report similar to that contained in the recommendation indicating violations in the data graph.
I have attached the configuration file that I use to configure Fuseki for this test, along with the data and shape graph ttl files defining the graphs and the two shell scripts I use to upload and validate the graph.
The upload and test shell scripts are based on the curl examples from [https://jena.apache.org/documentation/shacl/]
When I change the name of the graph, I get a 404, so I expect the code is validating the expected graph. I can also see the default graph displayed in the Fuseki viewer running locally at [http://localhost:8080/dataset.html] and the triples appear as indicanted in the attached file.
was:
I'm new to Jena Fuseki and SHACL, so I thought I would use the example from section 1.4 of the W3C Shapes Constraint Language document to insure I had everything up and running correctly. Unfortunately, when I upload the example graph and run their example shape graph, Fuseki indicates the data graph is validated:
{{}}
{quote}$ ./validate-data.sh
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix sh: <http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
[ a sh:ValidationReport ;
sh:conforms true
] .
$
{quote}
I expected a validation report similar to that contained in the recommendation indicating violations in the data graph.
I have attached the configuration file that I use to configure Fuseki for this test, along with the data and shape graph ttl files defining the graphs and the two shell scripts I use to upload and validate the graph.
The upload and test shell scripts are based on the curl examples from [https://jena.apache.org/documentation/shacl/]
When I change the name of the graph, I get a 404, so I expect the code is validating the expected graph. I can also see the default graph displayed in the Fuseki viewer running locally at [http://localhost:8080/dataset.html] and the triples appear as indicanted in the attached file.
> Incorrect validation returned when using the Fuseki SHACL processor
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-1808
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1808
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Fuseki, SHACL
> Affects Versions: Jena 3.13.1
> Environment: macOS Catalina 10.15.2 (19C57)
> openjdk 13.0.1 2019-10-15
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment AdoptOpenJDK (build 13.0.1+9)
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM AdoptOpenJDK (build 13.0.1+9, mixed mode, sharing)
> Reporter: Steve Roggenkamp
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: upload-data.sh, validate-data.sh, w3-shacl-example01-data.ttl, w3-shacl-example01-shapes.ttl, w3-shacl-example01.ttl
>
>
> I'm new to Jena Fuseki and SHACL, so I thought I would use the example from section 1.4 of the W3C Shapes Constraint Language document to insure I had everything up and running correctly. Unfortunately, when I upload the example graph and run their example shape graph, Fuseki indicates the data graph is validated:
> {noformat}$ ./validate-data.sh
> @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
> @prefix sh: <http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl#> .
> @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
> @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
> [ a sh:ValidationReport ;
> sh:conforms true
> ] .
> $
> {noformat}
>
> I expected a validation report similar to that contained in the recommendation indicating violations in the data graph.
> I have attached the configuration file that I use to configure Fuseki for this test, along with the data and shape graph ttl files defining the graphs and the two shell scripts I use to upload and validate the graph.
> The upload and test shell scripts are based on the curl examples from [https://jena.apache.org/documentation/shacl/]
> When I change the name of the graph, I get a 404, so I expect the code is validating the expected graph. I can also see the default graph displayed in the Fuseki viewer running locally at [http://localhost:8080/dataset.html] and the triples appear as indicanted in the attached file.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)