You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@qpid.apache.org by "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/06/08 17:10:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (QPIDJMS-390) Use Atomic Field Updater for case
where we create many AtomicBoolean instances
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16506279#comment-16506279 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPIDJMS-390:
---------------------------------------------------------
Commit 615fb084877c430c2d040427d78423ac8bab245b in qpid-jms's branch refs/heads/master from [~tabish121]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=qpid-jms.git;h=615fb08 ]
QPIDJMS-390 Use an atomic int field updater in ProviderFuture
Avoid allocation of AtomicBoolean instances for each ProviderFuture
instance and instead use an Atomic field updater to reduce GC overhead
> Use Atomic Field Updater for case where we create many AtomicBoolean instances
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPIDJMS-390
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-390
> Project: Qpid JMS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.32.0
> Reporter: Timothy Bish
> Assignee: Timothy Bish
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.33.0
>
>
> Use an Atomic field updater for the future we use for most provider operations as opposed to creating an AtomicBoolean for each instance of the the future class.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@qpid.apache.org