You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ambari.apache.org by Dmytro Sen <ds...@hortonworks.com> on 2015/05/26 18:52:59 UTC
Review Request 34667: ambari-server setup -s output needs improvement
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34667/
-----------------------------------------------------------
Review request for Ambari and Vitalyi Brodetskyi.
Bugs: AMBARI-11392
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-11392
Repository: ambari
Description
-------
Run ambari-server setup -s twice.
It displays a message which doesn't read quite right...
Change to:
[root@h-1 ~]# ambari-server setup -s
Using python /usr/bin/python2.6
Setup ambari-server
Nothing was done. Ambari Setup already performed and cannot re-run setup in silent mode. Use "ambari-server setup" command without -s option to change Ambari setup.
Diffs
-----
ambari-server/src/main/python/ambari_server/serverSetup.py e254a53
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34667/diff/
Testing
-------
unit tests passed
Thanks,
Dmytro Sen
Re: Review Request 34667: ambari-server setup -s output needs
improvement
Posted by Myroslav Papirkovskyy <mp...@hortonworks.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34667/#review85195
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Myroslav Papirkovskyy
On Травень 26, 2015, 7:52 після полудня, Dmytro Sen wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/34667/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Травень 26, 2015, 7:52 після полудня)
>
>
> Review request for Ambari and Vitalyi Brodetskyi.
>
>
> Bugs: AMBARI-11392
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-11392
>
>
> Repository: ambari
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Run ambari-server setup -s twice.
> It displays a message which doesn't read quite right...
> Change to:
> [root@h-1 ~]# ambari-server setup -s
> Using python /usr/bin/python2.6
> Setup ambari-server
> Nothing was done. Ambari Setup already performed and cannot re-run setup in silent mode. Use "ambari-server setup" command without -s option to change Ambari setup.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> ambari-server/src/main/python/ambari_server/serverSetup.py e254a53
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34667/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> unit tests passed
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dmytro Sen
>
>
Re: Review Request 34667: ambari-server setup -s output needs
improvement
Posted by Andrew Onischuk <ao...@hortonworks.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34667/#review85194
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Andrew Onischuk
On May 26, 2015, 4:52 p.m., Dmytro Sen wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/34667/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated May 26, 2015, 4:52 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Ambari and Vitalyi Brodetskyi.
>
>
> Bugs: AMBARI-11392
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-11392
>
>
> Repository: ambari
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Run ambari-server setup -s twice.
> It displays a message which doesn't read quite right...
> Change to:
> [root@h-1 ~]# ambari-server setup -s
> Using python /usr/bin/python2.6
> Setup ambari-server
> Nothing was done. Ambari Setup already performed and cannot re-run setup in silent mode. Use "ambari-server setup" command without -s option to change Ambari setup.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> ambari-server/src/main/python/ambari_server/serverSetup.py e254a53
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34667/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> unit tests passed
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dmytro Sen
>
>