You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "stack (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/02/27 00:21:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18309) Support multi threads in CleanerChore

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16377826#comment-16377826 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-18309:
-------------------------------

[~reidchan] You up for taking a look again at how CleanerChore does its single-instance pool? Findbugs was off for a while and when we reenabled it, it 'lit up" around this bit of code. I hacked on it, probably made it worse (HBASE-20069), but it passes findbugs now (smile).

First suggestion was a lazy singleton  ... but maybe that won't work because of onChangeConfiguration... where you want to support changing pool. Another suggestion at  https://reviews.apache.org/r/65794/#comment278374 is that rather than CleanerChore hosting the pool, instead we'd pass in the pool. This might be tough-to-do for same reason in that what happens onChangeConfiguration.... Do all instances change the pool....  

Anyways, would be interested in your thoughts. We could do it in a new issue? Thanks.

> Support multi threads in CleanerChore
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-18309
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18309
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: binlijin
>            Assignee: Reid Chan
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.0.0-beta-1
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-18309.addendum.patch, HBASE-18309.master.001.patch, HBASE-18309.master.002.patch, HBASE-18309.master.004.patch, HBASE-18309.master.005.patch, HBASE-18309.master.006.patch, HBASE-18309.master.007.patch, HBASE-18309.master.008.patch, HBASE-18309.master.009.patch, HBASE-18309.master.010.patch, HBASE-18309.master.011.patch, HBASE-18309.master.012.patch, space_consumption_in_archive.png
>
>
> There is only one thread in LogCleaner to clean oldWALs and in our big cluster we find this is not enough. The number of files under oldWALs reach the max-directory-items limit of HDFS and cause region server crash, so we use multi threads for LogCleaner and the crash not happened any more.
> What's more, currently there's only one thread iterating the archive directory, and we could use multiple threads cleaning sub directories in parallel to speed it up.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)