You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/12/11 17:51:35 UTC

[GitHub] [maven-site] michael-o commented on pull request #351: Using an SPDX identifier as the license name in example

michael-o commented on PR #351:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/351#issuecomment-1345616098

   > > Looking at https://spdx.org/licenses/ it differentiates between name and id. Here, we abuse our name as id. I consider this to be logically wrong.
   > 
   > We have text:
   > 
   > > Using an [https://spdx.org/licenses/}SPDX](https://spdx.org/licenses/%7DSPDX) identifier as the license `name` is recommended.
   > 
   > So how should be ...
   > 
   > I merged similar in ASF parent pom 😄
   
   I know that we have it and only because we don't have an id element. For me, it feels wrong, honestly, but I won't object to merge it.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org