[jira] [Created] (OPENJPA-2457) ReverseMappingTool.getClassName(...) should be public or have a public equivalent just like getFieldName(...).

["Jason Zwolak (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

Jason Zwolak created OPENJPA-2457:
-------------------------------------

             Summary: ReverseMappingTool.getClassName(...) should be public or have a public equivalent just like getFieldName(...).
                 Key: OPENJPA-2457
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2457
             Project: OpenJPA
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: jdbc
    Affects Versions: 2.4.0
            Reporter: Jason Zwolak
            Priority: Minor


While creating an implementation of ReverseCustomizer I came across tables that are not mapped and passed to MyReverseCustomizer.unmappedTable(...) method.  I would like to map the tables in much the same way the ReverseMappingTool would if it could map the tables; therefore, I'd like to use the same name converter implemented in getClassName.  getFieldName is public so I can map the fields the same as the ReverseMappingTool, so why not getClassName?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)