You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@airflow.apache.org by "Andrew Harmon (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/05/30 13:11:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (AIRFLOW-2318) Separate table and file names on Redshift/S3 Transfer

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-2318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16851836#comment-16851836 ] 

Andrew Harmon commented on AIRFLOW-2318:
----------------------------------------

anyone working on this? is it a duplicate of AIRFLOW-2862? I thin the s3_key should also be added as a templated field to further increase flexibility. I can tackle this if no one else working on it. 

> Separate table and file names on Redshift/S3 Transfer
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AIRFLOW-2318
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-2318
>             Project: Apache Airflow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: aws
>            Reporter: Kengo Seki
>            Assignee: neil90
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: redshift
>
> For now, RedshiftToS3Transfer and S3ToRedshiftTransfer requires that
> the table on Redshift and the file on S3 must have the same name.
> [As discussed on another issue|https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/3161#discussion_r179654982], this limitation should be loosen so that users can specify those names indivisually.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)