You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/04/01 06:46:41 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-2702) GetJMS vs ConsumeJMS
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15952082#comment-15952082 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2702:
--------------------------------------
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1643
@olegz could you have a look on this when you have time?
Cheers
> GetJMS vs ConsumeJMS
> --------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-2702
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2702
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation & Website
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0
> Reporter: Raymond
> Assignee: Andre F de Miranda
> Priority: Trivial
>
> In the GetJMS processors (Queue and Topic) you only can choose ActiveMQ as the MQ provider. In the documentation there is no indication that
> 1) ActiveMQ the only supported provider is
> 2) How to use another provider
> 3) That for other MQ providers one should use ConsumeJMS with a controlling service
> 4) That this processor is deprecated (as Oleg said on the developer list in May http://apache-nifi-developer-list.39713.n7.nabble.com/NIFI-amp-IBM-MQ-td10651.html)
> Maybe good to make this clearer in the documentation
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)