You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/04/01 06:46:41 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-2702) GetJMS vs ConsumeJMS

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15952082#comment-15952082 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2702:
--------------------------------------

Github user trixpan commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1643
  
    @olegz could you have a look on this when you have time?
    
    Cheers


> GetJMS vs ConsumeJMS
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-2702
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2702
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation & Website
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0
>            Reporter: Raymond
>            Assignee: Andre F de Miranda
>            Priority: Trivial
>
> In the GetJMS processors (Queue and Topic) you only can choose ActiveMQ as the MQ provider. In the documentation there is no indication that
> 1)	ActiveMQ the only supported provider is
> 2)	How to use another provider
> 3)	That for other MQ providers one should use ConsumeJMS with a controlling service
> 4)	That this processor is deprecated (as Oleg said on the developer list in May http://apache-nifi-developer-list.39713.n7.nabble.com/NIFI-amp-IBM-MQ-td10651.html)
> Maybe good to make this clearer in the documentation



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)