[PATCH][Collections] New testing framework, junit compatible

["Jack, Paul" <pj...@sfaf.org>]

http://www.geocities.com/apachecollections/june10

Rewrote BulkTest so that it extends TestCase.  It now provides
a static makeSuite(Class) method that can be used to create a
TestSuite that's displayed as a hierarchy in the swingui.  The
other code's all the same, except less files needed to be 
tweaked -- classes that don't use bulk test methods don't need
special suite() methods anymore.

Probably should have done it this way to begin with...

-Paul



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: [PATCH][Collections] New testing framework, junit compatible

["Michael A. Smith" <ma...@apache.org>]

On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Jack, Paul wrote:
> http://www.geocities.com/apachecollections/june10
> 
> Rewrote BulkTest so that it extends TestCase.  It now provides
> a static makeSuite(Class) method that can be used to create a
> TestSuite that's displayed as a hierarchy in the swingui.  The
> other code's all the same, except less files needed to be 
> tweaked -- classes that don't use bulk test methods don't need
> special suite() methods anymore.
> 
> Probably should have done it this way to begin with...

I hate ask you to do more work, but can you separate the changes to the
Bag implementations from the improvements to the testing framework?  I
think the testing framework can go in, but I'm not so sure about the
behavioral changes to the Bag implementations because they are not
backwards compatible.  I'd like to be able to evaluate those changes 
separately from the enhanced testing framework.  If you don't have time, 
not to worry too much about it, I'm sure I can figure it out myself, it 
just may take a little while longer.

thanks,
michael


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>