You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> on 2007/10/03 02:28:26 UTC
Re: GShell
Btw, the pax project has lots of interesting things.
See http://wiki.ops4j.org/confluence/display/ops4j/Pax+RadMan and much more.
On 10/3/07, Guillaume Nodet <gu...@iona.com> wrote:
> Forwarding to the dev list...
>
> FYI, Gshell is a subproject of Geronimo providing an extensible console
> (local and remote), kinda like bash.
>
> ------ Forwarded Message
> From: Guillaume Nodet <gu...@iona.com>
> Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 02:11:44 +0200
> To: Bruce Snyder <br...@iona.com>
> Conversation: On duplicating effort
> Subject: Re: On duplicating effort
>
>
>
>
> On 3/10/07 2:02, "Bruce Snyder" <br...@iona.com> wrote:
>
> > On 10/2/07 5:59 PM, "Guillaume Nodet" <gu...@iona.com> wrote:
> >
> >> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mod
> >> e=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=10950&fixfo
> >> r=11845
> >
> > So are you using GShell for SM-1074?
>
> Not really. Imho, gshell is just an interface to access features provided
> by other mechanism. Lifecycle is really tied to OSGi lifecycle, but yeah,
> we need to create Gshell commands for OSGi related stuff (start / stop
> bundles, etc...), but we could also have a web console for that, or a JMX
> one... What I mean is that Gshell should remain a mean of accessing these
> features.
>
> >
> > We also need to add a JIRA issue for the 1.0 compatibility layer.
>
> Done, SM-1083.
>
> Btw, we should have this discussion on the dev list ;-)
>
> Guillaume
>
> ------ End of Forwarded Message
>
>
> ----------------------------
> IONA Technologies SARL
> Identification: 415 295 930 R.C.S. Nanterre
> Siège: Immeuble Elysées La Défense, 7C place du Dôme, 92056 La Défense Cedex, France
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: GShell
Posted by Nodet Guillaume <gn...@gmail.com>.
Yeah agreed, I discovered this one too.
I've played a bit with pax-runner too this week while integrating
GShell.
Anyway, from a gshell perspective, i have been able to have a local
console running. However, it is quite heavy as you need to bring
plexus, xstream, classworlds and gshell itself. I really like the
fact that GShell has a nice ansi console, a nice command line
management and remoting. However, I'll try to have it delegate to
the felix shell instead as it is much more OSGi friendly (commands
are registered in the osgi registry).
On Oct 3, 2007, at 6:57 AM, Kit Plummer wrote:
> Im using the pax-logging stuff on a project. Very nice.
>
> Kit
>
> On Oct 2, 2007, at 5:28 PM, "Guillaume Nodet" <gn...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Btw, the pax project has lots of interesting things.
>> See http://wiki.ops4j.org/confluence/display/ops4j/Pax+RadMan and
>> much more.
>>
>> On 10/3/07, Guillaume Nodet <gu...@iona.com> wrote:
>>> Forwarding to the dev list...
>>>
>>> FYI, Gshell is a subproject of Geronimo providing an extensible
>>> console
>>> (local and remote), kinda like bash.
>>>
>>> ------ Forwarded Message
>>> From: Guillaume Nodet <gu...@iona.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 02:11:44 +0200
>>> To: Bruce Snyder <br...@iona.com>
>>> Conversation: On duplicating effort
>>> Subject: Re: On duplicating effort
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/10/07 2:02, "Bruce Snyder" <br...@iona.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/2/07 5:59 PM, "Guillaume Nodet" <gu...@iona.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?
>>>>> reset=true&mod
>>>>> e=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/
>>>>> field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=10950&fixfo
>>>>> r=11845
>>>>
>>>> So are you using GShell for SM-1074?
>>>
>>> Not really. Imho, gshell is just an interface to access features
>>> provided
>>> by other mechanism. Lifecycle is really tied to OSGi lifecycle,
>>> but yeah,
>>> we need to create Gshell commands for OSGi related stuff (start /
>>> stop
>>> bundles, etc...), but we could also have a web console for that,
>>> or a JMX
>>> one... What I mean is that Gshell should remain a mean of
>>> accessing these
>>> features.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> We also need to add a JIRA issue for the 1.0 compatibility layer.
>>>
>>> Done, SM-1083.
>>>
>>> Btw, we should have this discussion on the dev list ;-)
>>>
>>> Guillaume
>>>
>>> ------ End of Forwarded Message
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------
>>> IONA Technologies SARL
>>> Identification: 415 295 930 R.C.S. Nanterre
>>> Siège: Immeuble Elysées La Défense, 7C place du Dôme, 92056 La
>>> Défense Cedex, France
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: GShell
Posted by Kit Plummer <ki...@gmail.com>.
Im using the pax-logging stuff on a project. Very nice.
Kit
On Oct 2, 2007, at 5:28 PM, "Guillaume Nodet" <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Btw, the pax project has lots of interesting things.
> See http://wiki.ops4j.org/confluence/display/ops4j/Pax+RadMan and
> much more.
>
> On 10/3/07, Guillaume Nodet <gu...@iona.com> wrote:
>> Forwarding to the dev list...
>>
>> FYI, Gshell is a subproject of Geronimo providing an extensible
>> console
>> (local and remote), kinda like bash.
>>
>> ------ Forwarded Message
>> From: Guillaume Nodet <gu...@iona.com>
>> Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 02:11:44 +0200
>> To: Bruce Snyder <br...@iona.com>
>> Conversation: On duplicating effort
>> Subject: Re: On duplicating effort
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/10/07 2:02, "Bruce Snyder" <br...@iona.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/2/07 5:59 PM, "Guillaume Nodet" <gu...@iona.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mod
>>>> e=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/
>>>> field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=10950&fixfo
>>>> r=11845
>>>
>>> So are you using GShell for SM-1074?
>>
>> Not really. Imho, gshell is just an interface to access features
>> provided
>> by other mechanism. Lifecycle is really tied to OSGi lifecycle,
>> but yeah,
>> we need to create Gshell commands for OSGi related stuff (start /
>> stop
>> bundles, etc...), but we could also have a web console for that, or
>> a JMX
>> one... What I mean is that Gshell should remain a mean of
>> accessing these
>> features.
>>
>>>
>>> We also need to add a JIRA issue for the 1.0 compatibility layer.
>>
>> Done, SM-1083.
>>
>> Btw, we should have this discussion on the dev list ;-)
>>
>> Guillaume
>>
>> ------ End of Forwarded Message
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------
>> IONA Technologies SARL
>> Identification: 415 295 930 R.C.S. Nanterre
>> Siège: Immeuble Elysées La Défense, 7C place du Dôme, 92056 La
>> Défense Cedex, France
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/