You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Phil Scadden <P....@gns.cri.nz> on 2017/03/06 19:48:32 UTC
Recommendation for production SOLR
Given the known issues with 6.4.1 and no release date for 6.4.2, is the best recommendation for a production version of SOLR 6.3.0? Hoping to take to production in first week of April.
Notice: This email and any attachments are confidential and may not be used, published or redistributed without the prior written consent of the Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited (GNS Science). If received in error please destroy and immediately notify GNS Science. Do not copy or disclose the contents.
Re: Recommendation for production SOLR
Posted by Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>.
6.4.2 has passed the vote to release, so it should be hitting the
mirrors in a few days at most.
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Walter Underwood <wu...@wunderwood.org> wrote:
> We are going to production this week using 6.3.0. We don’t have time to re-run all the load benchmarks on 6.4.2.
>
> We’ll qualify 6.4.2 in a couple of weeks, then upgrade prod if it passes.
>
> wunder
> Walter Underwood
> wunder@wunderwood.org
> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
>
>> On Mar 6, 2017, at 11:48 AM, Phil Scadden <P....@gns.cri.nz> wrote:
>>
>> Given the known issues with 6.4.1 and no release date for 6.4.2, is the best recommendation for a production version of SOLR 6.3.0? Hoping to take to production in first week of April.
>> Notice: This email and any attachments are confidential and may not be used, published or redistributed without the prior written consent of the Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited (GNS Science). If received in error please destroy and immediately notify GNS Science. Do not copy or disclose the contents.
>
Re: Recommendation for production SOLR
Posted by Walter Underwood <wu...@wunderwood.org>.
We are going to production this week using 6.3.0. We don’t have time to re-run all the load benchmarks on 6.4.2.
We’ll qualify 6.4.2 in a couple of weeks, then upgrade prod if it passes.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wunder@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Mar 6, 2017, at 11:48 AM, Phil Scadden <P....@gns.cri.nz> wrote:
>
> Given the known issues with 6.4.1 and no release date for 6.4.2, is the best recommendation for a production version of SOLR 6.3.0? Hoping to take to production in first week of April.
> Notice: This email and any attachments are confidential and may not be used, published or redistributed without the prior written consent of the Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited (GNS Science). If received in error please destroy and immediately notify GNS Science. Do not copy or disclose the contents.