You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Michael McCandless (Commented) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/03/21 17:01:40 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3900) Make
BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData more debuggable
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13234446#comment-13234446 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3900:
--------------------------------------------
+1!
> Make BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData more debuggable
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3900
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3900
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Robert Muir
>
> This thing has gotten meaner recently, but if it fails, it can be tough to debug.
> I feel like usually we just look at whatever analyzer failed, and completely review the code
> and look for any smells until it passes :)
> So I think instead we can possibly make this easier if this does something like:
> {code}
> try {
> ...checks...
> } catch (Throwable t) {
> BaseTokenException e = new BaseTokenException(randomInputUsed, randomParamter1, randomParameter2);
> e.setInitCause(t);
> throw e;
> }
> {code}
> Then you could have a useful exception with the input string that caused the fail,
> information about whether or not charfilter/mockreaderwrapper/whatever were used, etc,
> as well as the initial problem as root cause.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org